Magnetic Field of a long straight wire

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field (B) in a square loop due to a long straight wire carrying a time-varying current defined by the equation i = (4.5 A/s²)t² - (10 A/s)t. The appropriate method for this calculation is to use the magnetic field formula derived from an infinite straight wire: B = (μ₀ I(t)) / (2π ρ) hat{φ}. The total magnetic flux through the loop is calculated using a surface integral, considering the area element dρ dz hat{φ} and avoiding integration across the wire itself to handle the singularity at ρ = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically magnetic fields.
  • Familiarity with the Biot-Savart Law and Ampere's Law.
  • Knowledge of cylindrical coordinates and surface integrals.
  • Ability to differentiate functions with respect to time to find electromotive force (emf).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the magnetic field from an infinite straight wire using the Biot-Savart Law.
  • Learn about surface integrals in cylindrical coordinates for calculating magnetic flux.
  • Explore the concept of electromotive force (emf) and its calculation in varying magnetic fields.
  • Investigate the implications of singularities in electromagnetic equations and their resolutions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding magnetic fields generated by current-carrying conductors.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
for the figure
a=12cm, b= 16cm
The current in a long straight wire is given by [itex]i = (4.5 A/s^2)t^2 - (10A/s)t[/itex]. Find the emf in the square loop at t=3.0s
now i was wondering how one would go about caluclating hte B in the square loop.
Would i use the biot savart law or Ampere's law?
I have a feeling it is ampere's law so that
[tex]\oint B \bullet ds = \mu_{0} i[/tex]
but then what is ds? The amperian loop in thsi case would be a cylinder that encompasses the whole square and more...
Please help on this
thank you for the help
 

Attachments

  • charge.JPG
    charge.JPG
    11.7 KB · Views: 502
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Skip Ampere and Biot-Savart, unless you've never derived the result for the magnetic field from an infinite straight wire before! Here's the result:
[tex] \begin{equation}<br /> \mathbf{B} = \frac{\mu_0 I(t)}{2\pi \rho} \hat{\phi} \, ;<br /> \end{equation}[/tex]
[tex]\rho[/tex] is the radial coordinate (in cylindrical coordinates). Now take this result, and forget about Ampere's law. You need to compute the flux in the loop.
First notice that (1) is singular at [tex]\rho = 0[/tex]. Second: we need to define an area element, since the total flux is written in terms of a surface integral. The area element
is [tex]d\rho \, dz \hat{\phi}[/tex], and so
[tex] \text{Flux } = \int \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{A} = +\int_0^b \int_\epsilon^{b-a} \frac{\mu_0 I(t)}{2\pi \rho} \, d\rho \, dz - \int_0^b \int_\epsilon^a \frac{\mu_0 I(t)}{2\pi \rho} \, d\rho \, dz\, .[/tex]
We're taking care of the problem at zero by coming arbitrarily close to the wire, but never integrating across it. (Why is there a minus sign in the second integral?)
The epsilons should cancel, and your result should be dimensionally correct. Now that you have the flux, go ahead and differentiate the current with respect to time to get
[tex]\mathcal{E}[/tex].
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K