Questioning logic used for highschool rocket propulsion problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a standard rocket propulsion problem, focusing on deriving an expression for the final velocity of a rocket based on various parameters such as exhaust velocity, final and initial mass, gravitational force, and time. Participants explore the implications of changing mass on the equations governing rocket motion, particularly in the context of thrust and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of using the equation F_{thrust} - F_{g} = ma, suggesting that the changing mass should lead to a different formulation: F_{thrust} - F_{g} = d(mv)/dt.
  • Another participant introduces a differential equation to describe the relationship between thrust, mass, and acceleration, indicating that mass is a function of time.
  • A different participant agrees that the mass change complicates the problem and emphasizes that the equation F_{thrust} - F_{g} = ma is valid for a single point in time.
  • One participant mentions the need to consider the ideal rocket equation and the effects of gravity on delta V, noting that real rocket launches involve more complex dynamics than a simple vertical ascent.
  • Another participant provides a detailed derivation of the rocket equation, explaining the integration process and the relationship between mass flow and acceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of changing mass in the equations of motion for rockets. While some agree on the validity of the differential approach, others highlight the complications that arise from the assumptions made in simpler models. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best way to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may not be as standard as initially presented, and the assumptions regarding constant forces and mass may not hold in all scenarios. The discussion also touches on the complexities of real-world rocket dynamics, which may not be fully captured by the simplified equations discussed.

sharpstones
Messages
25
Reaction score
3
Standard rocket propulsion problem. We are supposed to derive an expression for the final velocity of a rocket being launched into space based upon the exhuast velocity (Ve), final mass (Mf), intial mass (Mo), g, and time. The only forces acting on the rocket throughout the motion is the force of thrust and gravity, with the force of gravity being constant.

Now this is what my teacher has taught me, and this is the explanation that I have received on many websites. The derivation for the constant force of thrust is:

Fthrust = Ve(dm/dt)

This I understand. But then apparently when doing a summation of forces on the rocket it should be as follows:

[tex]F_{thrust}[/tex] - [tex]F_{g}[/tex] = ma

What I do not understand is why the summation of the forces can be set equal to ma. Obviously the velocity is increasing, so the rocket is experiencing an acceleration, but isn't the mass of the rocket itself changing? In this case the summation of forces should be:
[tex]F_{thrust}[/tex] - [tex]F_{g}[/tex] = d(mv)/dt
My physics teacher understands the point I am trying to make, and says he does not know for sure why the changing mass is disregarded. I have the feeling that my challenge is wrong, but I am not sure why. Can anyone help me with this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass is a function of time. You're looking at a differential equation:

[tex]v_e \frac{dm(t)}{dt} - m(t) g = m(t) a(t)[/tex]

- Warren
 
Originally posted by sharpstones
Standard rocket propulsion problem.

Depending on how detailed you're getting, this is far from a standard problem.

Now this is what my teacher has taught me, and this is the explanation that I have received on many websites. The derivation for the constant force of thrust is:

Fthrust = Ve(dm/dt)

OK. That's right for the level of detail you're looking at.

This I understand. But then apparently when doing a summation of forces on the rocket it should be as follows:

[tex]F_{thrust}[/tex] - [tex]F_{g}[/tex] = ma

That's correct for any single point in time. You're right about the mass changing. You can't just plug and chug for a single acceleration value. This is why many launch vehicles throttle their engines during launch to keep acceleration levels reasonable on the craft.

Warren's equation is correct here. I don't know if you're familiar with differential equations or not.

Can anyone help me with this problem?

You'll need to use the ideal rocket equation for this one (which is derived from Warren's formula).

[tex]\Delta V = - V_e \ln{\frac{M_{final}}{M_{initial}}}[/tex]

On top of that, you'll need to figure out how much delta V is given by gravity.

Now, note that just shooting straight up isn't what really happens, and that makes the problem seriously non-trivial. A rocket in orbit is going sideways relative to the surface of the Earth, so the gravity and the thrust are not acting in opposite directions throughout the ascent.

I don't know how (or if) you want to handle this.
 
Last edited:
The problem itself is a ideal rocket problem that would use the equation that enigma stated. I guess my problem was trying to look beyond the equation towards the derivation that come's from Warren's equation which ( I assume ) would have answered my question if I fully understood it.

Thank you for the quick reply... Now I've just got to let this stew in my head for a little bit.

*breaks out dad's college calc book and starts trying to learn differential equations*
 
Here's how the derivation goes. I hope this'll make sense to you.

Ignoring the gravity term:

[tex]v_e \frac{dm}{dt} = m a[/tex]

Now, since for your acceleration to be up, the exit velocity of the fuel is down, so you need a (-) sign in there. Dividing m to the other side to isolate a:

[tex]- V_e \frac{1}{m} \frac{dm}{dt} = a[/tex]

Now you want to integrate this from two points in time.

An integral is the area under the curve. To give you an example you can relate to, if you have a constant acceleration and a set time, you multiply the two together giving you a 'square' of size a*t, and units m/s^2 * s = m/s.

The integral just does this including non-constant values. A definite integral looks at the ending conditions and subtracts the initial conditions from the final conditions - effectively looking at the difference.

Also, the integral of 1/x is ln(x), the integral of acceleration is velocity (acceleration is the rate of change of velocity), and constants can be pulled out of the integral, so:

[tex]\int_{ti}^{tf} - V_e \frac{1}{m} \frac{dm}{dt} dt= \int_{t1}^{tf} a dt[/tex]

[tex]- V_e \int_{ti}^{tf} \frac{1}{m} dm= \int_{t1}^{tf} a dt[/tex]

[tex]-V_e * (\ln{m_f} - \ln{m_i}) = V_f - V_i[/tex]

[tex]-V_e * \ln{\frac{m_f}{m_i}} = \Delta V[/tex]

Hopefully you can understand what all that means, not having taken calculus. If you have any questions, just ask.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K