What minimum speed v is required to keep the ball moving in a circle?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving projectile motion and energy conservation. Participants are exploring the minimum speed required to maintain circular motion and the components of velocity in a projectile's trajectory, particularly in relation to gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the significance of given angles and components of velocity in the context of energy conservation. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of initial conditions and the relationship between horizontal and vertical motion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the independence of horizontal and vertical motions, while others are questioning the application of energy conservation principles. There is an ongoing exploration of how to approach the problem of calculating work done by gravitational forces and the vertical component of velocity at specific points in the projectile's path.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential confusion regarding the parameters of the problem, including the height and distance involved in the calculations. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations about the relationship between different components of motion and energy.

pringless
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
got it hehe..
can someone check a post down and help me with that problem. thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand the question.
and use the angle theta measured with respect to the vertical which is 66.1 degrees.
What does this mean? Where did 66.1 degrees come from? What significance does it have? How am I supposed to "use" it?"
What minimum speed v is required to keep the ball moving in a circle?
But the problem already gives the velocity at the top of the circle -- so you can solve easily for the velocity at any other part of the circle. What minimum velocity is it asking about?

- Warren
 
mm sorry, the angle was for another part of the problem. i got it by using the formula mv^2/r = mg and solving for v.

but this problem:
A particle of mass .349kg is shot from a point P, at height L = 97 m, with an inital velocity v having a horizontal component of v_x = 19.5 m/s. The particle rises to a maximum height of h = 22.5 m above P. Using conservation of energy, determine the vertical component of v at the inital position P.

im not sure how to get components with energy
 
Originally posted by pringless

A particle of mass .349kg is shot from a point P, at height L = 97 m, with an inital velocity v having a horizontal component of v_x = 19.5 m/s. The particle rises to a maximum height of h = 22.5 m above P. Using conservation of energy, determine the vertical component of v at the inital position P.
The horizontal and vertical motions are independent. For this problem, just completely ignore the horizontal component. The 19.5 m/s is just a red herring!

Gravity only "works" vertically -- in other words, the horizontal position of the particle doesn't have anything to do with the particle's gravitational potential energy. The only thing that matters for gravity is its vertical position.

The particle moved 22.5 m upwards, trading all of its initial vertical kinetic energy for gravitational potential energy. The original vertical kinetic energy was [itex]K = (1/2) m v_{iy}^2[/itex]. The final gravitational potential energy of the particle is [itex]m g y[/itex]. Since the particle traded all of its vertical kinetic energy for gravitational potential, the two energies are equal:

[tex]\frac{1}{2} m v_{iy}^2 = m g y[/tex]

[tex]v = \sqrt{2 g y}[/tex]

Does this make sense? Note that this is exactly the velocity that the particle would have if it FELL 22.5 meters! It's the same problem, just going up instead of down. As you probably know, if you throw a ball upwards with some velocity v, it comes down again with the same velocity v.

- Warren
 
thanks warren... i was trying to use the horizontal component they gave me to solve the problem. oops.

now i have to find thework done by the gravitational force on the particle during its motion to a point B, which is at the end of the parabolic motion located L + h distance down.

to find the work done by the graviational force on the particle would i just be using mgh but with the total distance of L + h now?
 
Originally posted by pringless
to find the work done by the graviational force on the particle would i just be using mgh but with the total distance of L + h now?
If you're referring to the work done from the highest point in its motion, yes.

The work done on the particle by gravity in moving from height A to height B is mg(A-B).

- Warren
 
how would i find the magnitude of the vertical component of the velocity vector when the particle hits point B
 
The gravitational potential energy lost = the vertical kinetic energy gained. Exactly as in the last problem.

- Warren
 
so PE_initial = KE_final

mgh = .5mv^2

v = sqrroot(2gh), h = L = 97 right?
 
  • #10
Yes, but I'm not sure where you got h = L = 97 m. I thought the problem said h = 22.5 m.

- Warren
 
  • #11
its one of those problems where the projectile motion parabola is extended past the ground, so its all the way down which is what L = 97 in the problem is refereing to
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K