How Do You Calculate Relative Velocity and Meeting Points for Two Cyclists?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a relative velocity problem involving two cyclists approaching an intersection. Cyclist A travels east at 3 m/s, while Cyclist B travels north at 4 m/s, starting from specific distances from the intersection. The problem includes calculating the relative velocity of B with respect to A and determining their positions when they are closest to each other, as well as exploring the effects of acceleration and deceleration on their arrival times at the intersection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up a coordinate system to analyze the velocities and positions of the cyclists. There are attempts to differentiate the distance function to find when the cyclists are closest together. Some participants question the interpretation of the problem, particularly regarding the distinction between relative velocity and the rate at which they are closing in on each other.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with participants providing different approaches to the calculations. Some have offered guidance on setting up equations and differentiating them, while others express confusion about specific steps and seek clarification. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final answers yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion in the problem's structure, particularly with the labeling of parts (a, b, i, ii). There are also discussions about the assumptions made regarding the cyclists' movements and the need for further clarification on the equations used in the calculations.

mcintyre_ie
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hey
I’m just having a bit of trouble with this relative velocity question:

A cyclist A is pedalling at 3m/s due east along a straight road. A second cyclist B is pedalling at 4m/s due north along another straight road intersecting the first at a junction P.

(a) If A is 80m and B is 40m from p at a given moment, calculate
a. The velocity of B relative to A
b. How far each cyclist is from p when they are nearest together.
(b) If when A and B are 80 and 40m from p, respectively, then A immediately accelerates at 0.1m/s^2 and B decelerates at q m/s^2
(i) Find the velocity of B relative to A in terms of t
(ii) Determine the value of q which causes them to arrive at p together.

This is what I've got so far:

Work so far.

I think I've gotten a part a right, and I've made a start on a part b, but I am pretty much lost on part b (i) and (ii).
Any help would be appreciated.

(v = velocity, Va = velocity of A, Vb = velocity of B, Vab = velocity of B, relative to A)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. I am told I don't have "permission" to look at your website!
2. Are both cyclists moving toward the intersection?
3. Does the problem really have (i) and (ii) under (b) but a. and b. under (a)?
4. Is the problem really asking for relative velocity rather than the rate at which they are closing?

Assuming all this is true then:
Set up a coordinate system with origin at P, the positive x-axis to the east, and positive y-axis to the north, then A's velocity (relative to the ground) is (3,0) and B's is (0,4). B's velocity relative to A is
(0,4)-(3,0)= (-3, 4).
A's position after t seconds is (-80+ 3t,0) while B's position is (0,-40+4t). The distance between them (squared) is (3t-80)2+(4t-40)2. That is a minimum when its derivative 6(3t-80)+ 8(4t-40)= 50t- = 800 or t= 16 seconds. At that point the distance between them is √((-192)2+ (24)2)= √(37440)= 193.5 m.

Now we assume that A decelerates at 0.1 m/s2. Then his velocity at time t is (3-0.1t, 0) and his position is (-80+ 3t- 0.05t2,0). B decelerates at q m/s2. His velocity at time t is (0,4-qt) and position (0,-40+ 4t- (q/2)t2).

To find the velocity of B relative to A, subtract the velocity vectors relative to P as before: (0,4-qt)-(3- 0.1t)= (-3+0.1t,4-qt).

To have them arrive at P at the same time, we must solve
-80+ 3t- 0.05t2= 0 for t (to find when A arrives there), substitute that value into -40+ 4t- (q/2)t2= 0 to find the value of q that gets B there at the same time.
 
1. Thislink should work.
2. From my reading of the question, i would think that yes, they are both moving toward the intersection at junction P.
3. Yes there is an A part a and b and a B part i and ii. If you don't get confused by the question then youll just get confused with the order, either way youre screwed.
4. I would think that part A (a and b) are both looking for RV, whereas part B (i and ii) are looking for the rate at which theyre closing.

Thanks again for the help, i hope this clears up the question for you a little bit.
 
Ive just been looking through your answer Hallsofivy, and I've just got a few questions for you:

Assuming all this is true then:
Set up a coordinate system with origin at P, the positive x-axis to the east, and positive y-axis to the north, then A's velocity (relative to the ground) is (3,0) and B's is (0,4). B's velocity relative to A is
(0,4)-(3,0)= (-3, 4).
A's position after t seconds is (-80+ 3t,0) while B's position is (0,-40+4t). The distance between them (squared) is (3t-80)2+(4t-40)2. That is a minimum when its derivative 6(3t-80)+ 8(4t-40)= 50t- = 800 or t= 16 seconds. At that point the distance between them is ã((-192)2+ (24)2)= ã(37440)= 193.5 m.
What the question was asking was how far the two cyclists are from p when they are nearest together: from reading your reply it seemed to me like you were finding the closest distance they were from each other - like i was doing, but our answers are very different. You say
That is a minimum when its derivative 6(3t-80)+ 8(4t-40)= 50t- = 800 or t= 16 seconds
i don't really follow this part very well, could you maybe explain a bit more?


Now we assume that A decelerates at 0.1 m/s2. Then his velocity at time t is (3-0.1t, 0) and his position is (-80+ 3t- 0.05t2,0). B decelerates at q m/s2. His velocity at time t is (0,4-qt) and position (0,-40+ 4t- (q/2)t2).
Where did the "-80+3t - 0.05t2" equation come from, particulary the 0.05t2 part?

To have them arrive at P at the same time, we must solve
-80+ 3t- 0.05t2= 0 for t (to find when A arrives there), substitute that value into -40+ 4t- (q/2)t2= 0 to find the value of q that gets B there at the same time.
When i tried to solve your equation, i got a complex answer (iotas), so somewhere along the way there's been an error. Any idea? I've spent a while looking through your solution, the bits i follow seem ok, i don't know if you or anybody else can maybe find some mistakes.
Thanks again
 
Hi, I get slightly different results to HallsOfIvy.

[tex]V_{BA}=-3i+4j[/tex]

I also get the time till there distance is a minimum = 16 seconds
At this point, A is 32m from junction, B is 24m.
(i used same method as HallsOfIvy)

my equation was [tex]d^2=(-40+4t)^2+(-80+3t)^2[/tex]

differentiating this gave a minimum value of t as 16.

I got new relative veloctiy as

[tex]V_{BA}=-(3+0.1t)i+(4-qt)j[/tex]

I found a value for t in the quadratic as 17.01562

This gave q=2.1157

Do you have the correct answers?
 
Thanks
I don't have the answers as of yet, i should have them by the end of the week though. I am stil not too clear on how both of you got the equations to differentiate, so i guess I am missing something fundamental to the understanding of the question. Thanks again for the help.
 
The formula comes from finding their distances from (0,0) the origin after t seconds. If you draw the diagram with A at (-80,0) and B at (0,-40) and you consider their velocities. A is moving towards the junction therefore the distance is getting smaller. After 1 second A is at the point (-77,0) and after two seconds is at the point (-74,0).

Therefore the distance of A from the junction after t seconds is (-80+3t) metres

Similar reasoning is used for the position of B after t seconds.

Then its just pythagorus with the distance between them being the hypotenuse of the right angled triangle, the right angle is the junction. Thats where the expression comes from
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K