PDA

View Full Version : specific heat????


tucky
Dec6-03, 05:20 PM
Hey guys….I need help with another problem.

Q: Below are two sets of data from an experiment to determine the specific heat of a metal sample. For which mass will t the uncertainty n the specific heat be greater? Explain your answer. The uncertainty in all temperature measurements is +/- 1 degree C. And for all masses are +/- .1g. The specific heat of water is 1.0 cal/g degree C with negligible uncertainty.

Metal Sample A:
Initial temperature A----25 C
Mass of metal A-------- 100g
Initial Temp of water----100 C
Mass of water-----200g
Thermal Equilibrium temp of metal B in water---75 C

Metal Sample B:
Initial temp B----25C
Mass of metal----100g
Initial temp of water----100C
Mass of water----200g
Thermal Equilibrium temp of metal B in water---90C

A: Q=m*C*(change temp)

Metal A Q=(.1 +/-.0001kg)C(348+/-1K-298+/-1k)
Metal A Q=5+/-.19716KgKC

Metal B Q=(.1 +/-.0001kg)C(363+/-1K-298+/-1k)
Metal B Q=6.5+/-.29705KgKC


Now, I am stuck…I don’t know how to finish this problem. Can anyone help me??? Actually, I don’t even know if I am on the right track.

Tucky

arcnets
Dec7-03, 01:42 PM
I think this is an exercise in error propagation.
If you have a function

f = f(x, y, z),

then the uncertainty is

df = \sqrt{ (\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dx)^2 + (\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}dy)^2 + (\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}dz)^2}.

tucky
Dec7-03, 02:10 PM
Is there a way to do work this problem with out calculus? Because my class is an algebra/trig based class. Thank you for your help.

arcnets
Dec7-03, 02:41 PM
Well, in the 2 experiments all data are the same, except for the final temperature. So you could argue that the larger change in temperature corresponds to the smaller relative error.