Ghetalion
Dec25-05, 12:31 PM
Hawkings has bet Thorne.... again... this time, he has intentionally left out the mathematically simulated feasibility of a naked singulary. His reasoning? He says that the variable alignment of such a possibility could not occur naturally.
This lead me to a-thinkin!
Which system has more variable complexity in it? The probability of a naked singulary or the probability of anthromorphic principle? And could complexity be a reasonable argument to say why a clearly complicated way of variable alignment cannot naturally occur?
This lead me to a-thinkin!
Which system has more variable complexity in it? The probability of a naked singulary or the probability of anthromorphic principle? And could complexity be a reasonable argument to say why a clearly complicated way of variable alignment cannot naturally occur?