Godel's science version?

[waht]

I'm wondering though, if you prove godel's theorem for science, that would be the greatest scientific discovery, because that would imply the universe has infinite possibilities which is better than a closed system governed by a set of laws and you would be stuck without further development as a result.

What do you think.

[Hurkyl]

I'm going to ignore the opinion. Would you care to state:

(1) Just what "Gödel's theorem for science" (GTFS) would say.
(2) Why GTFS would suggest the universe has infinite possibilities.
(3) Why GTFS would suggest the universe is not a closed system.
(4) Why GTFS would suggest the universe is not governed by a set of laws.
(5) Who would be stuck without further development.
(6) What you mean by "further development".
(7) Why GTFS would suggest they'd be stuck without further development.

[loseyourname]

Please do a little more studying of what the theorems actually state and mean and then formulate a better thesis. I'm not saying this is the case, but it very much looks like you just took a look at the word "incompleteness" and thought hey, maybe physical laws can never be complete, meaning anything is possible in principle.

I applaud your curiosity, but you've stated implications that just aren't the case. Not understanding the theorems is fine, but ask about it then instead of drawing false conclusions and basing a thread on them.