Total internal reflection problem.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving total internal reflection in a rectangular block of glass with a specified refractive index. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that total internal reflection occurs only if the refractive index is greater than 1.414, which is the square root of 2.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the refractive index and the angles involved in total internal reflection. Some question how to derive the critical angle without specific angle measurements, while others suggest using the geometry of the situation to understand the relationships between angles.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the angles of incidence and refraction, with hints and suggestions being shared. Some participants express confusion about the angles involved and the conditions for total internal reflection, indicating a productive dialogue without a clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of a diagram and the challenge of working with varying angles of incidence. The discussion includes references to Snell's law and the critical angle, highlighting the complexity of the problem without resolving it.

walker
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
If anyone could provide some insight into how I might go about solving this problem it would be greatly appreciated.

Q: A ray enters the flat end of a long rectanglular block of glass that has refractive index n_2 as shown in the following figure. Show that all the entering rays can be totally internally reflected only if n_2 > 1.414

http://jzzyos.shackspace.com/diagram.JPG
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wow... I think that's going to be hard without any angles given...
 
Aiiieeeee!

Well I was fooling around with the 1.414 number I realized that it was the sqrt of 2. I figured this must mean something so I did a search on the weeb and found some sites that discuss the rare 1.414 index.

"for total internal reflection at 45 degrees, a dense to rare refractive index ratio of 1.414, the square root of two, is required."

So I guess somehow I have to prove that the angle of light entering the glass will refract in such a way that its incident angle against the interior of the glass is at an angle of 45 degrees...
 
Originally posted by walker
If anyone could provide some insight into how I might go about solving this problem it would be greatly appreciated.
Here's a hint. Figure out (in terms of n) the maximum angle Θ2. Then realize that the biggest Θ2 gives the smallest Θ3. Make that smallest Θ3 the critical angle and solve for n.
 
Great man! Thanks for the tip! I'll give er a go and see what turns out.
 
Solution?

Hey all, totally bringing this up from the thread graveyard, but I too am having the same problems with this question. I understand where Doc Al is coming from but I still don't have a Θ1 to go from. Any help with this would be more then amazing.
 
Maybe you're supposed to get it from the picture?
If the picture is given with the incoming light ray, just get your geotriangle (or whatever you call it) to measure the angle of incidence.
 
z_sharp said:
I understand where Doc Al is coming from but I still don't have a Θ1 to go from.
Don't think in terms of a specific Θ1; instead, you must consider the light entering the block at any angle.

This might help (since the diagram is no longer viewable): Light is entering one end of the block (at all angles of incidence) and must internally reflect from the sides of the block.
 
Doc Al said:
Here's a hint. Figure out (in terms of n) the maximum angle Θ2. Then realize that the biggest Θ2 gives the smallest Θ3. Make that smallest Θ3 the critical angle and solve for n.


hmmmm...I have the same problem and I'm still having trouble with it.

the incident angle (Θ1) can range anywhere from 1 degree to 89 degrees as it hits the glass,

which would make the max Θ2 = 89 degrees

which would make the smallest Θ3 = 1 degree

but a critical angle of 1 degree doesn't sound right.
Any idea where I'm going wrong here?
 
  • #10
bullroar_86 said:
hmmmm...I have the same problem and I'm still having trouble with it.

the incident angle (Θ1) can range anywhere from 1 degree to 89 degrees as it hits the glass,

which would make the max Θ2 = 89 degrees

which would make the smallest Θ3 = 1 degree

but a critical angle of 1 degree doesn't sound right.
Any idea where I'm going wrong here?


I don't have the diagram, but I am guessing Θ2 is the angle between the ray and the normal inside the first surface of the glass, and that Θ3 is the angle between the ray in the glass and the side of the glass perpendicular to the entry surface. If that is correct, for total internal reflection Θ3 must be greater than the critical angle, when all the light hitting the second surface is reflected back into the glass.

The geometry is really pretty simple. What has to be true of the sum Θ2 + Θ3 ? Light incident at 89.999 degrees will enter the glass at Θ2, and for any kind of glass that angle will be a lot less than 89 degrees. That light must be incident on the second surface at that same angle, or greater, to be totally reflected. Since the surfaces are perpendicular, the angle of refraction at the first surface has to be no more than 45 degrees, and the angle of incidence at the second surface has to be at least 45 degrees. So what must be the index of refraction?
 
  • #11
bullroar_86 said:
the incident angle (Θ1) can range anywhere from 1 degree to 89 degrees as it hits the glass,
[itex]\theta_1[/itex], the angle of incidence at the end surface, ranges from 0 to 90 degress.

which would make the max Θ2 = 89 degrees
[itex]\theta_2[/itex], the angle of refraction at the end surface, is constrained by Snell's law to be: [itex]n_1 \sin \theta_1 = n_2 \sin \theta_2[/itex]. Thus the maximum [itex]\theta_2[/itex] is given by [itex]\sin \theta_2 = (n_1/n_2)[/itex].

As OlderDan points out, the relationship between [itex]\theta_2[/itex] and [itex]\theta_3[/itex] (the angle of incidence at the side surface) is a simple one. To ensure total internal reflection, that minimum [itex]\theta_3[/itex] must be at the critical angle, thus [itex]\sin \theta_3 = (n_1/n_2)[/itex]. A little trig (or geometry) will allow you to solve for [itex]n_2[/itex] assuming [itex]n_1 = 1[/itex].

Here's another discussion of essentially the same problem, which you may find helpful: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=71377
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K