rob langley
May12-06, 05:00 AM
I would be very grateful to receive comments on any in-principle unwarranted
assumptions in the following claim that EP violation (of weak, Einstein and
strong versions) suggests a theoretical basis for some appropriately-defined
MoND/TeVeS-like theory, and that the requirement implied by the WMAP results
for so-called dark matter has a much simpler, geometrical explanation.
This claim is based on the following suppositions -
1. the 3 lightcone regions (null, spacelike, timelike) represent a tetrad of
temporal dimensions 1D(t), 2D(t) and 3D(t)
2. spacelike and timelike entanglement are *linear connections* in regions
2D(t) (D5) and 3D(t) (D6) respectively just as null radiation is a linear
connection in the 1D(t) (D4) classical regime
3. the higher dimensional analogues of *frequency* of null radiation at D4
are the *frequency* of violation of Bell inequality (being a measure of
strength of quantum correlation) for D5 spacelike and D6 timelike
entanglement
4. radiation, mass and gravitation are associated with temporal phases D4,
D5 and D6 respectively
5. linearity is the *difference* between temporal phases
6. just as radiation frequency falls off, higher linearity (violation)
frequencies fall off
7. linearity fall-off therefore corresponds to phase fall-off.
Hence,
(i) just as we observe *apparent* radiation fall-off under high values of
velocity and *actual* 1D(t) fall-off or phase-shift under acceleration (the
so-called Twins paradox), so
(ii) we should observe *apparent* mass fall-off under high values of
acceleration (rotation), and *actual* mass fall-off under non-uniform
acceleration, and
(iii) we should observe *apparent* gravitational fall-off under high values
of non-uniform acceleration and *actual* gravitational fall-off under a
*change of* non-uniform acceleration (ie, the fourth derivative of
position).
Since QG establishes a correspondence between mass (change of D4 velocity)
and information (change of D4 energy), insistence on EP-'flatness' or
m(i)=m(g) is therefore the cause of the so-called missing mass and missing
information paradoxes. This approach also clearly implies that radiation,
mass and gravitation are relative or observer-dependent.
Many thanks
R H Langley
__________________________________________________ _______________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters!
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
assumptions in the following claim that EP violation (of weak, Einstein and
strong versions) suggests a theoretical basis for some appropriately-defined
MoND/TeVeS-like theory, and that the requirement implied by the WMAP results
for so-called dark matter has a much simpler, geometrical explanation.
This claim is based on the following suppositions -
1. the 3 lightcone regions (null, spacelike, timelike) represent a tetrad of
temporal dimensions 1D(t), 2D(t) and 3D(t)
2. spacelike and timelike entanglement are *linear connections* in regions
2D(t) (D5) and 3D(t) (D6) respectively just as null radiation is a linear
connection in the 1D(t) (D4) classical regime
3. the higher dimensional analogues of *frequency* of null radiation at D4
are the *frequency* of violation of Bell inequality (being a measure of
strength of quantum correlation) for D5 spacelike and D6 timelike
entanglement
4. radiation, mass and gravitation are associated with temporal phases D4,
D5 and D6 respectively
5. linearity is the *difference* between temporal phases
6. just as radiation frequency falls off, higher linearity (violation)
frequencies fall off
7. linearity fall-off therefore corresponds to phase fall-off.
Hence,
(i) just as we observe *apparent* radiation fall-off under high values of
velocity and *actual* 1D(t) fall-off or phase-shift under acceleration (the
so-called Twins paradox), so
(ii) we should observe *apparent* mass fall-off under high values of
acceleration (rotation), and *actual* mass fall-off under non-uniform
acceleration, and
(iii) we should observe *apparent* gravitational fall-off under high values
of non-uniform acceleration and *actual* gravitational fall-off under a
*change of* non-uniform acceleration (ie, the fourth derivative of
position).
Since QG establishes a correspondence between mass (change of D4 velocity)
and information (change of D4 energy), insistence on EP-'flatness' or
m(i)=m(g) is therefore the cause of the so-called missing mass and missing
information paradoxes. This approach also clearly implies that radiation,
mass and gravitation are relative or observer-dependent.
Many thanks
R H Langley
__________________________________________________ _______________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters!
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters