How Does Changing Arm Position Affect a Spinning Professor's Kinetic Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tandoorichicken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotating
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the effect of arm position on a spinning professor's kinetic energy while standing on a freely rotating platform. Initially, the professor's angular velocity is 1.5 rad/sec with dumbbells in outstretched arms, which increases to 5.0 rad/sec when he pulls his arms in. The calculated ratio of final kinetic energy to initial kinetic energy is 25:4.5, but the weight of the professor and dumbbells does not affect the outcome due to the conservation of angular momentum. The key takeaway is that the radius from the center of rotation to the center of mass changes when the arms are repositioned, impacting the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational kinetic energy equations
  • Familiarity with angular momentum conservation principles
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia calculations
  • Basic physics concepts related to rotational motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equations for rotational kinetic energy in detail
  • Learn about moment of inertia for different shapes and configurations
  • Explore the concept of conservation of angular momentum in various scenarios
  • Investigate the effects of changing radius on rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of rotational motion and energy conservation in dynamic systems.

tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
A physics teacher stands on a freely rotation platform. He holds a dumbbell in each hand of his outstretched arms while a student gives him a push until his angular velocity reaches 1.5 rad/sec. When the freely spinning professor pulls his hands in close to his body, his angular velocity increases to 5.0 rad/sec. What is the ratio of his final kinetic energy to his initial energy?

Basically what I have done is formed the professor into a model of 1) a rod with two spinning dumbells and 2) a cylinder. Using that I was able to use the equations for rotational KE:
[tex]KE_0 = \frac{1}{2} I \omega_{0}^{2} = \frac{1}{2} (mr^2) 1.5^2 = 1.125mr^2[/tex] and
[tex]KE_f = \frac{1}{2} I \omega_{f}^{2} = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{1}{2} mr^2) 5^2 = \frac{25}{4} mr^2[/tex].
Dividing the second equation by the first I got a ratio of 25:4.5
However, it never occurred to me that the weight of the teacher and the weight of the dumbbells might have an effect on the outcome of this problem. So basically, how do I do this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum is given by [tex]L=I\omega[/tex]

Basically this is a quantity that must be conserved so if his initial [tex]E_k=\frac{L^2}{2I}[/tex] must be equal to his final kinetic energy and thus a ratio of 1:1 would be the answer as far as I can see.
 
"Weight" has nothing to do with this problem- everything is happening horizontally, not vertically. You do, of course, have to use the mass, m. It cancels out in the final calculation as you saw.

However, you seem to be using the same "r" in both problems and that is not correct. r is the distance from the center of rotation (i.e. the teacher's central axis) to the center of mass. That changes when the dumbbells are drawn in toward the body.

Since you are not told the different radii (you might estimate them based on a typical person but you can't get them precisely), the best thing to do is use Kurdt's hint. Can you say "conservation of energy"?
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
3K