Quote re frequency being fundamental

[Ray Tomes]

Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
the quote and when and where it was said?

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Igor Khavkine]

On 2005-09-09, Ray Tomes <ray@tomes.remove.biz> wrote:
> Some years ago I read a book in which a famous physicist is saying that
> ultimately energy, mass and frequency are all equivalent (presumably
> from E=Mc^2 and E=hf). He then goes on to say that the most fundamental
> may be frequency. I think that he was a nobel prize winner from Texas
> but have forgotten his name. Can anyone help me please with the name,
> the quote and when and where it was said?

This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here

http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html

Hope this helps.

Igor

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/

[Ray Tomes]

Igor Khavkine wrote:
> This statement is quite generic and could be made by anyone sufficiently
> familiar with quantum field theory. I don't think I could pin it on a
> specific person. I can, however, say that there is a Nobel prize winner
> who's now a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His name is
> Stephen Weinberg. He has written a number of popular science books over
> the years. A list of these books and a short bio can be found here
>
> http://www.ph.utexas.edu/~weintech/swbio.html
>
> Hope this helps.

Yes it does help. Stephen Weinberg is the name I could not remember.

Thank you!

--
Ray Tomes
http://ray.tomes.biz/
http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/