Daniel
May12-04, 01:52 PM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>[Moderator\'s note: Some of these questions are addressed in the FAQ,\nspecifically in\n\nhttp://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/universe.html\n\n-TB]\n\n\n\none problem in particle physics is explaining the asymetry between\nmatter and anti-matter. as difficult a problem it is, isn\'t the big\nbang and black hole problem even more so?\n\nhow is the big bang different in GR and QM from a black hole?\n\nwhy didn\'t the enormous gravity and singularity of the big bang\nimplode into itself and form a giant black hole?\n\nin the few seconds after the big bang, why didn\'t the matter-energy\ncave into itself into a black hole?\n\nin the few decades following the big bang, why didn\'t the clumps of\nmatter (and presumably dark matter) coalese as black holes? why do we\neven see stars and galaxies?\n\nhowever one explains the big bang, why not apply that to black holes?\nsimilarly, why don\'t black holes spontaneously explode like the big\nbang?\n\nwith such large amounts of mass-energy immediately following the\nbig-bang, wouldn\'t gravity warp space-time to the point time freezes?\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>[Moderator's note: Some of these questions are addressed in the FAQ,
specifically in
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/universe.html
-TB]
one problem in particle physics is explaining the asymetry between
matter and anti-matter. as difficult a problem it is, isn't the big
bang and black hole problem even more so?
how is the big bang different in GR and QM from a black hole?
why didn't the enormous gravity and singularity of the big bang
implode into itself and form a giant black hole?
in the few seconds after the big bang, why didn't the matter-energy
cave into itself into a black hole?
in the few decades following the big bang, why didn't the clumps of
matter (and presumably dark matter) coalese as black holes? why do we
even see stars and galaxies?
however one explains the big bang, why not apply that to black holes?
similarly, why don't black holes spontaneously explode like the big
bang?
with such large amounts of mass-energy immediately following the
big-bang, wouldn't gravity warp space-time to the point time freezes?
specifically in
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/universe.html
-TB]
one problem in particle physics is explaining the asymetry between
matter and anti-matter. as difficult a problem it is, isn't the big
bang and black hole problem even more so?
how is the big bang different in GR and QM from a black hole?
why didn't the enormous gravity and singularity of the big bang
implode into itself and form a giant black hole?
in the few seconds after the big bang, why didn't the matter-energy
cave into itself into a black hole?
in the few decades following the big bang, why didn't the clumps of
matter (and presumably dark matter) coalese as black holes? why do we
even see stars and galaxies?
however one explains the big bang, why not apply that to black holes?
similarly, why don't black holes spontaneously explode like the big
bang?
with such large amounts of mass-energy immediately following the
big-bang, wouldn't gravity warp space-time to the point time freezes?