is there an expression for the difference of two square no.s, except, of course for rsquare minus ssquare
huba
Sep14-08, 02:44 PM
(r+s)(r-s)
chhitiz
Sep14-08, 03:32 PM
god you are funny. i posted this question because i was trying to find out all possible no.s which have a self-conjugating ferrer's graph, and needed to see if diff. of two square no.s is in anyway in form of a triangle no. or not. anyways, i have inferred that all no.s except for 2 can be jotted as a self-conjugating ferrer's graph. am i correct?
CRGreathouse
Sep14-08, 05:45 PM
Your first post was entirely unclear, and I'm not quite sure what your second means. "if diff. of two square no.s is in anyway in form of a triangle no. or not"? Does that mean something like "Is the difference of two squares triangular?"?
If that interpretation is generally correct, I can think of at least four ways to take it:
\forall n>m \exists t:t(t+1)/2=n^2-m^2
\forall n \exists m,t:t(t+1)/2=n^2-m^2
\forall N \exists n>m>N,t:t(t+1)/2=n^2-m^2
\exists n,m,t:t(t+1)/2=n^2-m^2
If it's not, then you'll have to be more clear.
chhitiz
Sep15-08, 02:54 AM
that was exactly what i meant, so thanks
CRGreathouse
Sep15-08, 03:25 AM
Which?
chhitiz
Sep15-08, 11:27 AM
the first one. by the way, am i not correct in saying that all +ve integers except 2 can be expressed as a self conjugating ferrer's graph?
CRGreathouse
Sep15-08, 04:08 PM
the first one.
\forall n>m \exists t:t(t+1)/2=n^2-m^2
The first few (n, m) for which this fails are:
(3, 1)
(5, 1)
(3, 2)
(4, 2)
(4, 3)
(5, 3)
(5, 4)