thorium
May17-04, 08:21 AM
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/05/040514030155.htm
I don't know if this has been discussed.
I Know 1 billion years still falls within the margins of error. But I like the way it fits with Turner's paper ( in the stiky threads).
It also fits with those that estimate the age at 13.7 BY, 14+-0.5, 13+-1.5 BY.
So this is actually good news, right?
I don't know if this has been discussed.
I Know 1 billion years still falls within the margins of error. But I like the way it fits with Turner's paper ( in the stiky threads).
It also fits with those that estimate the age at 13.7 BY, 14+-0.5, 13+-1.5 BY.
So this is actually good news, right?