Contradiction in Force*Time Applications: Where Am I Wrong?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter E8
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the application of force and time in different striking scenarios, specifically comparing the techniques used in sports like baseball and golf to those used in martial arts. Participants explore the implications of contact time on momentum transfer and force generation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the contradictory advice regarding contact time when striking objects, noting that sports techniques advocate for prolonged contact while martial arts suggest minimizing it.
  • Another participant explains that maximizing contact time when hitting a ball allows for greater momentum transfer, as the total momentum is the sum of all momentum transferred during the interaction.
  • In contrast, when breaking an object, it is argued that a peak in momentum is necessary to achieve a greater force in a shorter time, which is essential for breaking rather than pushing.
  • A later reply discusses the impact strength of materials, using the example of steel versus aluminum, to illustrate how different materials respond to force and energy during impact.
  • Another participant suggests that the differences in energy absorption and force concentration relate to elastic versus inelastic collisions and the nature of rigid versus non-rigid bodies.
  • One participant reiterates that the goal in sports is to add momentum over time, while in martial arts, the objective is to deliver a concentrated force quickly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to contact time in striking scenarios, as multiple competing views remain regarding the application of force and momentum in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of momentum and force in relation to contact time, as well as the implications of material properties on energy transfer during impacts.

E8
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I'm confused w/ whether or not I want to or not want to maintain contact w/ something when I strike it to get the most affect. For example they say when you're hitting a baseball or a golf ball to maintain contact as long as possible (the 'follow through') to drive it as far as you can. However, when trying to karate chop boards in half or trying to knock-out somebody w/ a punch they say to minimize the contact time. Both are based on Force*time=change in momentum.

It seems like the 2 contact time applications are contradictory where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Greetings E8 !

When you strike a ball you need to maximize
the total momentum on it.
Momentum is p = m * v , where m is mass and
v is velocity. The total momentum on the ball
is the sum of all the momentum transferred to it
during the time of the interaction and so as
long as your club still has some forward momentum
left it's better to transfer as much of it as
possible to the ball.

When you try to break something you need to maximize
your force or specific momentum. That is, you need a peak
in momentum at some point thus resulting in a greater
force F = m * a = m * v / t = p / t at that specific
moment, to break whatever it is you're trying to break.

Live long and prosper.
 
Originally posted by E8
I'm confused w/ whether or not I want to or not want to maintain contact w/ something when I strike it to get the most affect. For example they say when you're hitting a baseball or a golf ball to maintain contact as long as possible (the 'follow through') to drive it as far as you can. However, when trying to karate chop boards in half or trying to knock-out somebody w/ a punch they say to minimize the contact time. Both are based on Force*time=change in momentum.

It seems like the 2 contact time applications are contradictory where am I going wrong?

If what you're hitting is a house with a head and has a name like "Vini" - remain in contact for as short a time as possible. Then turn and run as fast as possible. :-)

Pmb
 


Originally posted by drag
When you try to break something you need to maximize
your force or specific momentum. That is, you need a peak
in momentum at some point thus resulting in a greater
force F = m * a = m * v / t = p / t at that specific
moment, to break whatever it is you're trying to break.
There is a seeming paradox here: For example, though the tensile strength of steel is far higher than aluminum, steel requires less energy to break in an impact. There is a piece of equipment called a Charpy tester where you put small blocks of a given material into a device and swing an axe-like pendulum at them. When the pendulum breaks the block, it swings up to a specific height. The difference between the starting height and the new height is the kinetic energy required to break it - its the impact strength. Most steel is relatively brittle. When the pendulum hits it, it bends very little, concentrating the energy into a short, fast, hard force that easily snaps the block. Aluminum on the other hand is more ductile (softer). When the pendulum hits it, the energy is obsorbed when the aluminum bends. Because of this it takes many times as much energy to break an aluminum block in an impact than it does steel. Its acually a neat lab in materials science.
 


Originally posted by russ_watters
When the pendulum hits it, it bends very little, concentrating the energy into a short, fast, hard force that easily snaps the block. Aluminum on the other hand is more ductile (softer). When the pendulum hits it, the energy is obsorbed when the aluminum bends. Because of this it takes many times as much energy to break an aluminum block in an impact than it does steel. Its acually a neat lab in materials science.
I think that has to do more with elastic/non-elestic
collisions and rigid/non-rigid bodies.
 
When you hit a ball, you want to add as much momentum to it as possible -- as long as you can maintain contact, you are still pushing it, so it makes sense to follow through as long as you can. When you hit a person or a board, you're trying to hurt/break them, not push them: so you want to pack the energy of your blow into as short a time (and hence as large a force) as possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
13K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K