Photon self-interference interpreted as inside-out dynamic

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamic Photon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the interpretation of photon self-interference through the concept of an "inside-out" dynamic, as proposed in the article "P-Duality: Quantum Mechanics Inside-Out." The author explains that photons possess an inverse wavefunction that allows for self-interference between their virtual and real wavefunctions, fundamentally altering our understanding of phase space. The dialogue also touches on the implications of nonlocality and the mechanisms by which particles return to their polarized states, emphasizing the intrinsic connection between local and nonlocal phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the double-slit experiment.
  • Familiarity with wavefunction concepts, including inverse wavefunctions.
  • Knowledge of nonlocality in quantum physics.
  • Basic grasp of phase space and its components (real, virtual, mixed).
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of nonlocality in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the double-slit experiment and its interpretations in depth.
  • Explore the concept of wavefunction collapse and its relation to measurement.
  • Investigate the role of phase space in quantum field theory.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in theoretical physics, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of photon behavior and the implications of quantum mechanics on reality.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Photon self-interference interpreted as "inside-out" dynamic

My http://www.quantumdream.net first article, "P-Duality: Quantum Mechanics Inside-Out," explains my concept of the inverse wavefunction, applicable to the virtual realm and its real interactions.

The double-slit experiment was Feynman's favorite demonstration of quantum mechanics. It raises the questions of how individual particles can interfere with themselves and how the act of measurement can interfere with observation outcome.

I address the problem of the double-slit experiment by explaining that photons have an "inside-out" phase character, correlated at a primal event. Inverse phase space contains compactified within the photon all information of its conventional phase space. Thus a single photon enables self interference between its interior (virtual) and exterior (real) wavefunctions.

In effect, the dynamical universe is inverted through the photon action. Our phase space is part real, part virtual, and part mixed - part subliminal, part superluminal, and part luminal. The observer perspective is that of self, other and their correlation.

Can you appreciate the possibility that the photon itself naturally carries the information needed to perpetuate self-interference through the interactions between the inverse wavefunction and its conventional counterpart?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Inside phase space self-interference: nonlocality

Loren Booda said:
My http://www.quantumdream.net first article, "P-Duality: Quantum Mechanics Inside-Out," explains my concept of the inverse wavefunction, applicable to the virtual realm and its real interactions.

The double-slit experiment was Feynman's favorite demonstration of quantum mechanics. It raises the questions of how individual particles can interfere with themselves and how the act of measurement can interfere with observation outcome.

I address the problem of the double-slit experiment by explaining that photons have an "inside-out" phase character, correlated at a primal event. Inverse phase space contains compactified within the photon all information of its conventional phase space. Thus a single photon enables self interference between its interior (virtual) and exterior (real) wavefunctions.

In effect, the dynamical universe is inverted through the photon action. Our phase space is part real, part virtual, and part mixed - part subliminal, part superluminal, and part luminal. The observer perspective is that of self, other and their correlation.

Can you appreciate the possibility that the photon itself naturally carries the information needed to perpetuate self-interference through the interactions between the inverse wavefunction and its conventional counterpart?

I was surprised by your post as I have a very similar construction myself. Our words may differ, but the fundamental concepts are very very close. I have a link that http://frontiernet.net/~mgh1/ through various arrangements of Stern-Gerlach segments. Its a graphics rich tutorial on Stern-Gerlach and two hole diffraction. Pure QM heresy.

I have called the elements that guarantee the reformation of the +S base state after transitioning through the unobstructed T segment, unobserved or nonlocal, and existence critical to the reformation of the +S base state from the +S -> T -> +S transition.

How does the particle know how to return to the proper state, which is after all, a polarized direction of the particle's magnetic monopole? It knows because the T state is not simply one of three possible states, as the T has the nonlocal elements of the +S state embedded intrinsically within the T state. Of all the nonlocality, inverse wave functions, you name it, there is an unambiguous reality of force exchanges between local and nonlocal entities. Nonlocal ain't a philosophy, it's a reality, maybe the reality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
943
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
963
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K