Kirk Gregory Czuhai
Jun1-04, 02:12 PM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>On the Radial Distribution of Galactic Mass\n© 2004 Kirk Gregory Czuhai\nall rights reserved\n\nAdmittedly this is a first draft of a chiefly an article of\nspeculation but supported by one experimental result namely:\n\nThe apparently radial distribution of luminous mass from disk shaped\ngalaxies. I cannot remember the post in alt.physics.research but one\nscientist has a VERY GOOD graphical fit assuming a constant change to\nthe curve fit to the data at a certain radial distance R0 from the\ncenter of disk shaped galaxies in their luminous mass distribution.\n\nPeople have called this "curve fit" just plain ugly. And wanted to\ndiscard any chance of any theory fitting the data! This seems a bad\napproach!\n\nI think what is actually taking place is for the first set of constant\nyou have the normal stars that are in orbits around the galactic core\nin a pretty normal fashion. While in the second choice of constant you\nhave luminous stars that are only loosely bound to the galactic core\nhaving been chaotically ejected from the main portion of the galaxy or\nin very eccentric orbits.\n\nAny comments?\n\nPeace and love,\n\n(kirk) kirk gregory czuhai\n\nhttp://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kirksresume.htm\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>On the Radial Distribution of Galactic Mass
© 2004 Kirk Gregory Czuhai
all rights reserved
Admittedly this is a first draft of a chiefly an article of
speculation but supported by one experimental result namely:
The apparently radial distribution of luminous mass from disk shaped
galaxies. I cannot remember the post in alt.physics.research but one
scientist has a VERY GOOD graphical fit assuming a constant change to
the curve fit to the data at a certain radial distance R0 from the
center of disk shaped galaxies in their luminous mass distribution.
People have called this "curve fit" just plain ugly. And wanted to
discard any chance of any theory fitting the data! This seems a bad
approach!
I think what is actually taking place is for the first set of constant
you have the normal stars that are in orbits around the galactic core
in a pretty normal fashion. While in the second choice of constant you
have luminous stars that are only loosely bound to the galactic core
having been chaotically ejected from the main portion of the galaxy or
in very eccentric orbits.
Any comments?
Peace and love,
(kirk) kirk gregory czuhai
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kirksresume.htm
© 2004 Kirk Gregory Czuhai
all rights reserved
Admittedly this is a first draft of a chiefly an article of
speculation but supported by one experimental result namely:
The apparently radial distribution of luminous mass from disk shaped
galaxies. I cannot remember the post in alt.physics.research but one
scientist has a VERY GOOD graphical fit assuming a constant change to
the curve fit to the data at a certain radial distance R0 from the
center of disk shaped galaxies in their luminous mass distribution.
People have called this "curve fit" just plain ugly. And wanted to
discard any chance of any theory fitting the data! This seems a bad
approach!
I think what is actually taking place is for the first set of constant
you have the normal stars that are in orbits around the galactic core
in a pretty normal fashion. While in the second choice of constant you
have luminous stars that are only loosely bound to the galactic core
having been chaotically ejected from the main portion of the galaxy or
in very eccentric orbits.
Any comments?
Peace and love,
(kirk) kirk gregory czuhai
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kirksresume.htm