Lord of Chaos(Suresh Devanathan)
Jun14-04, 03:08 PM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>If we were look at the wave equation\n\n[-d^2/dx^2 + V(x)]Phi(x,t) = d/dt Phi(x,t)\n\nand read thru it\n\nAm i simulating all such possible systems implicitly, in 1 step, because the\nalgebra and differential form contains all possible class of such equations?\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>If we were look at the wave equation
[-d^2/dx^2 + V(x)]\Phi(x,t) = d/dt \Phi(x,t)
and read thru it
Am i simulating all such possible systems implicitly, in 1 step, because the
algebra and differential form contains all possible class of such equations?
[-d^2/dx^2 + V(x)]\Phi(x,t) = d/dt \Phi(x,t)
and read thru it
Am i simulating all such possible systems implicitly, in 1 step, because the
algebra and differential form contains all possible class of such equations?