Can a NASA Senior Physicist Agree with a Junior Physicist's Calculation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter walker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strange
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the disagreement between a NASA senior physicist and a junior physicist regarding the speed of an artificial satellite. The junior physicist calculated the speed as v = 3 x 10^4 m/s at an altitude of 230 km, while the senior physicist asserted that the correct speed should be approximately 7,000 m/s based on the principles of circular motion. The senior physicist emphasized that the centripetal acceleration formula, a = v²/r, reveals a contradiction in the junior physicist's calculation, indicating that the satellite would not maintain its altitude at the proposed speed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Circular motion principles
  • Centripetal acceleration formula (a = v²/r)
  • Understanding of gravitational acceleration (g = 9.0 m/s²)
  • Basic knowledge of satellite dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of circular motion in physics
  • Learn about gravitational forces affecting satellite orbits
  • Explore the calculations involved in satellite velocity and altitude
  • Review resources on orbital mechanics and satellite dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in satellite dynamics and orbital mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

walker
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
So I came across a question in a quiz book the other day and I still haven't been able to answer it, so I figured I would ask some experts... Here goes...


As a NASA senior physicist, would you agree with the calculation made by a junior physicist regarding the speed of an artificial satellite, v = 3 x 10^4 m/s, assuming that it is traveling at an altitude h = 230 km above the Earth's surface where g = 9.0 m/s^2. The radius of the Earth is 6370 km.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would disagree.

For all circular motion, a = v2/r, where a is the centripetal acceleration, v is the linear velocity, and r is the radius of the circle.

Plug the numbers in, and you'll see there's a contradiction.

The satellite should be moving at roughly 7,000 m/s, not 30,000 m/s.

For more info on circular motion: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/circ.html#circ

- Warren
 
Yep,

If the sat is going at that speed and altitude, it won't be at that altitude for long.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K