sol
Jul6-04, 12:19 PM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>"If GLAST detects violations of lorentz invariance in the form of\nenergy-dependent photons velocity, in agreement with theoretical\ncalculations, such observations and such agreement would strongly\nsupport LQG. It would also represent a severe problem for\nstring/m-theory, as string theory in its current formulation\npresupposes lorentz invariance is an exact symmetry of nature, valid\nat all scales.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity"\n\n"\n\nI have been striving to understand the differences between LQG and\nString theory. Reinforcement of one, seems to help describe the other.\n\nCan someone speak to the quoted paragraph?\n\n\n[Moderator\'s note: This has been discussed here before. In order not to\nbecome overly repetetive I\'ll suggest to have a look at the archive\nbefore responding. -usc]\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>"If GLAST detects violations of lorentz invariance in the form of
energy-dependent photons velocity, in agreement with theoretical
calculations, such observations and such agreement would strongly
support LQG. It would also represent a severe problem for
string/m-theory, as string theory in its current formulation
presupposes lorentz invariance is an exact symmetry of nature, valid
at all scales.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity"
"
I have been striving to understand the differences between LQG and
String theory. Reinforcement of one, seems to help describe the other.
Can someone speak to the quoted paragraph?
[Moderator's note: This has been discussed here before. In order not to
become overly repetetive I'll suggest to have a look at the archive
before responding. -usc]
energy-dependent photons velocity, in agreement with theoretical
calculations, such observations and such agreement would strongly
support LQG. It would also represent a severe problem for
string/m-theory, as string theory in its current formulation
presupposes lorentz invariance is an exact symmetry of nature, valid
at all scales.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity"
"
I have been striving to understand the differences between LQG and
String theory. Reinforcement of one, seems to help describe the other.
Can someone speak to the quoted paragraph?
[Moderator's note: This has been discussed here before. In order not to
become overly repetetive I'll suggest to have a look at the archive
before responding. -usc]