<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>\n\n\n\nI\'ve read that neutrinos from Supernova 1987A were observed to arrive\n18 hours before the photons.\nhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844807/posts\n\nA time lag of 18 hours seems like a long wait between the initial\nnuclear fury and the final visible blast of stellar material being\nejected at millions of mph.\nhttp://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1997/03/text\n\nWhy is the detonation to explosion process so slow?\n\nEugene Shubert\nhttp://www.everythingimportant.org\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>I've read that neutrinos from Supernova 1987A were observed to arrive
18 hours before the photons.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844807/posts
A time lag of 18 hours seems like a long wait between the initial
nuclear fury and the final visible blast of stellar material being
ejected at millions of mph.
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1997/03/text
Why is the detonation to explosion process so slow?
Eugene Shubert
http://www.everythingimportant.org
greywolf42
Jul20-04, 04:25 AM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>\nPerfectly Innocent <perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com> wrote in message\nnews:c45b45b3.0407171523.67f2a084@posting.google.com...\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> I\'ve read that neutrinos from Supernova 1987A were observed to arrive\n> 18 hours before the photons.\n> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844807/posts\n>\n> A time lag of 18 hours seems like a long wait between the initial\n> nuclear fury and the final visible blast of stellar material being\n> ejected at millions of mph.\n> http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1997/03/text\n>\n> Why is the detonation to explosion process so slow?\n\nThe first part of the answer is the observer delay.\n\nThe neutrino pulse was detected by an automated system (the Kamiokande\nproton-decay experiment), that happened to be \'on\' when the neutrino pulse\narrived. This system can accept sources anywhere in a 4 pi solid angle.\n\nVisible-light detectors are tightly focused. The supernova was first\nnoticed by a human (taking a break) looking at the magellanic clouds with\nhis eyes. There was an unavoidable delay in getting recording devices\npointed in that direction. (It turned out that there was a photographic\nplate of that region a bit earlier.)\n\nThe second part of the answer is the source of the emission of the different\nparticles.\n\nIn our current understanding of supernovae models*, several things are\nhappening. A supernova begins when the core cannot support the star against\ngravitational forces, because too much iron has formed in the core (fusion\nof any element with iron *absorbs* energy). As the core collapses, nuclei\nand electrons are converted into neutrons. This conversion takes only a few\nseconds, before the formation of a sphere of neutrons about the size of the\nEarth is complete. It is the conversion of core material into neutrons that\ngives rise to the neutrino pulse.\n\nThe rest of the star is still falling. Until it hits the neutron surface.\nThe dynamics are complex, but the old \'irresistable force vs. the immovable\nobject\' results in a lot of energy and secondary fusions in the non-core\nmaterial, as a shock wave ripples out through the infalling material. The\ndensities are even high enough to absorb a significant fraction of the\nneutrinos (though most escape so that a small fraction can trigger\nKamiokande). The supernovae material also absorbs photons. It takes time\nto reverse the infall, and to create an expanding shell of material around\nthe (new) neutron star. And thus, it takes a significant time to release\nthe first photons from the explosion.\n\n* Note that Sanduleak (the star presumed to have blown) was a blue star.\nAnd blue stars were not supposed to go supernova ... at least according to\nthe models.\n\n--\ngreywolf42\nubi dubium ibi libertas\n{remove planet for return e-mail}\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>Perfectly Innocent <perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com> wrote in message
news:c45b45b3.0407171523.67f2a084@posting.google.com...
>
>
>
>
> I've read that neutrinos from Supernova 1987A were observed to arrive
> 18 hours before the photons.
> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844807/posts
>
> A time lag of 18 hours seems like a long wait between the initial
> nuclear fury and the final visible blast of stellar material being
> ejected at millions of mph.
> http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1997/03/text
>
> Why is the detonation to explosion process so slow?
The first part of the answer is the observer delay.
The neutrino pulse was detected by an automated system (the Kamiokande
proton-decay experiment), that happened to be 'on' when the neutrino pulse
arrived. This system can accept sources anywhere in a 4 \pi solid angle.
Visible-light detectors are tightly focused. The supernova was first
noticed by a human (taking a break) looking at the magellanic clouds with
his eyes. There was an unavoidable delay in getting recording devices
pointed in that direction. (It turned out that there was a photographic
plate of that region a bit earlier.)
The second part of the answer is the source of the emission of the different
particles.
In our current understanding of supernovae models*, several things are
happening. A supernova begins when the core cannot support the star against
gravitational forces, because too much iron has formed in the core (fusion
of any element with iron *absorbs* energy). As the core collapses, nuclei
and electrons are converted into neutrons. This conversion takes only a few
seconds, before the formation of a sphere of neutrons about the size of the
Earth is complete. It is the conversion of core material into neutrons that
gives rise to the neutrino pulse.
The rest of the star is still falling. Until it hits the neutron surface.
The dynamics are complex, but the old 'irresistable force vs. the immovable
object' results in a lot of energy and secondary fusions in the non-core
material, as a shock wave ripples out through the infalling material. The
densities are even high enough to absorb a significant fraction of the
neutrinos (though most escape so that a small fraction can trigger
Kamiokande). The supernovae material also absorbs photons. It takes time
to reverse the infall, and to create an expanding shell of material around
the (new) neutron star. And thus, it takes a significant time to release
the first photons from the explosion.
* Note that Sanduleak (the star presumed to have blown) was a blue star.
And blue stars were not supposed to go supernova ... at least according to
the models.
--
greywolf42
ubi dubium ibi libertas
{remove planet for return e-mail}
Uncle Al
Jul20-04, 04:25 AM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>\nPerfectly Innocent wrote:\n>\n> I\'ve read that neutrinos from Supernova 1987A were observed to arrive\n> 18 hours before the photons.\n> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844807/posts\n>\n> A time lag of 18 hours seems like a long wait between the initial\n> nuclear fury and the final visible blast of stellar material being\n> ejected at millions of mph.\n> http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1997/03/text\n>\n> Why is the detonation to explosion process so slow?\n\n1) The neutrinos went though most of the star unimpeded. The\nphotons had to diffuse out.\n\n2) The neutrinos were 90+% of the energy liberated. Even after\nthe photons neared the surface they had to build luminosity by\nexpanding radiating area.\n\n--\nUncle Al\nhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/\n(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)\nhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>Perfectly Innocent wrote:
>
> I've read that neutrinos from Supernova 1987A were observed to arrive
> 18 hours before the photons.
> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844807/posts
>
> A time lag of 18 hours seems like a long wait between the initial
> nuclear fury and the final visible blast of stellar material being
> ejected at millions of mph.
> http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1997/03/text
>
> Why is the detonation to explosion process so slow?
1) The neutrinos went though most of the star unimpeded. The
photons had to diffuse out.
2) The neutrinos were 90+% of the energy liberated. Even after
the photons neared the surface they had to build luminosity by
expanding radiating area.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
David M. Palmer
Jul21-04, 05:02 AM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>\nIn article <c45b45b3.0407171523.67f2a084@posting.google.com>, Perfectly\nInnocent <perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com> wrote:\n\n> I\'ve read that neutrinos from Supernova 1987A were observed to arrive\n> 18 hours before the photons.\n> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844807/posts\n>\n> A time lag of 18 hours seems like a long wait between the initial\n> nuclear fury and the final visible blast of stellar material being\n> ejected at millions of mph.\n> http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1997/03/text\n>\n> Why is the detonation to explosion process so slow?\n\n\nThe neutrinos come from the core collapse, and stream out of the star\nat the speed of light. At the same time, the first bounce of the core\ncollapse sends a shock wave out from the center towards the surface of\nthe star.\n\nThe radius of the progenitor was 3e12 cm = 100 light seconds.\n(Earth-Sun distance is ~500 light seconds, the Sun is 2.3 light-seconds\nin radius). The shock wave travels much slower than the speed of\nlight, especially near the core where the density is much higher and\n(to a lesser extent) the wave is fighting upstream against the star\nfalling into the core.\n\nAlso the supernova was visible about 5 hours after the neutrinos, in a\nphoto that wasn\'t developed until after the discovery was announced.\nBut it didn\'t get really bright until it had expanded enough to give it\na lot more radiating area than it had when it was just a punk-ass blue\nsupergiant 40 times the diameter of the Sun. (Apart from the intense\nultraviolet flash at shock breakout, which wan\'t directly detected and\nput most of its flux into photons too high in energy to get through\nEarth\'s atmosphere).\n\nhttp://zebu.uoregon.edu/~soper/StarDeath/sn1987a.html\nhttp://zebu.uoregon.edu/~imamura/208/mar1/sk.html\n\n--\nDavid M. Palmer dmpalmer@email.com (formerly @clark.net, @ematic.com)\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>In article <c45b45b3.0407171523.67f2a084@posting.google.com>, Perfectly
Innocent <perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com> wrote:
> I've read that neutrinos from Supernova 1987A were observed to arrive
> 18 hours before the photons.
> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844807/posts
>
> A time lag of 18 hours seems like a long wait between the initial
> nuclear fury and the final visible blast of stellar material being
> ejected at millions of mph.
> http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1997/03/text
>
> Why is the detonation to explosion process so slow?
The neutrinos come from the core collapse, and stream out of the star
at the speed of light. At the same time, the first bounce of the core
collapse sends a shock wave out from the center towards the surface of
the star.
The radius of the progenitor was 3e12 cm = 100 light seconds.
(Earth-Sun distance is ~500 light seconds, the Sun is 2.3 light-seconds
in radius). The shock wave travels much slower than the speed of
light, especially near the core where the density is much higher and
(to a lesser extent) the wave is fighting upstream against the star
falling into the core.
Also the supernova was visible about 5 hours after the neutrinos, in a
photo that wasn't developed until after the discovery was announced.
But it didn't get really bright until it had expanded enough to give it
a lot more radiating area than it had when it was just a punk-ass blue
supergiant 40 times the diameter of the Sun. (Apart from the intense
ultraviolet flash at shock breakout, which wan't directly detected and
put most of its flux into photons too high in energy to get through
Earth's atmosphere).
--
David M. Palmer dmpalmer@email.com (formerly @clark.net, @ematic.com)
Ulmo
Jul21-04, 05:02 AM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>\n\n"greywolf42" <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote in message news:<10fnuuhd6kvng10@corp.supernews.com>...\n> Perfectly Innocent <perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com> wrote in message\n> In our current understanding of supernovae models*, several things are\n> happening. A supernova begins when the core cannot support the star against\n> gravitational forces, because too much iron has formed in the core (fusion\n> of any element with iron *absorbs* energy). As the core collapses, nuclei\n> and electrons are converted into neutrons. This conversion takes only a few\n> seconds, before the formation of a sphere of neutrons about the size of the\n> Earth is complete. It is the conversion of core material into neutrons that\n> gives rise to the neutrino pulse.\n>\n> The rest of the star is still falling. Until it hits the neutron surface.\n> The dynamics are complex, but the old \'irresistable force vs. the immovable\n> object\' results in a lot of energy and secondary fusions in the non-core\n> material, as a shock wave ripples out through the infalling material. The\n> densities are even high enough to absorb a significant fraction of the\n> neutrinos (though most escape so that a small fraction can trigger\n> Kamiokande). The supernovae material also absorbs photons. It takes time\n> to reverse the infall, and to create an expanding shell of material around\n> the (new) neutron star. And thus, it takes a significant time to release\n> the first photons from the explosion.\n>\n> * Note that Sanduleak (the star presumed to have blown) was a blue star.\n> And blue stars were not supposed to go supernova ... at least according to\n> the models.\n\nCan you give a similar explantion for the formation of so-called quark stars?\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>"greywolf42" <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote in message news:<10fnuuhd6kvng10@corp.supernews.com>...
> Perfectly Innocent <perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com> wrote in message
> In our current understanding of supernovae models*, several things are
> happening. A supernova begins when the core cannot support the star against
> gravitational forces, because too much iron has formed in the core (fusion
> of any element with iron *absorbs* energy). As the core collapses, nuclei
> and electrons are converted into neutrons. This conversion takes only a few
> seconds, before the formation of a sphere of neutrons about the size of the
> Earth is complete. It is the conversion of core material into neutrons that
> gives rise to the neutrino pulse.
>
> The rest of the star is still falling. Until it hits the neutron surface.
> The dynamics are complex, but the old 'irresistable force vs. the immovable
> object' results in a lot of energy and secondary fusions in the non-core
> material, as a shock wave ripples out through the infalling material. The
> densities are even high enough to absorb a significant fraction of the
> neutrinos (though most escape so that a small fraction can trigger
> Kamiokande). The supernovae material also absorbs photons. It takes time
> to reverse the infall, and to create an expanding shell of material around
> the (new) neutron star. And thus, it takes a significant time to release
> the first photons from the explosion.
>
> * Note that Sanduleak (the star presumed to have blown) was a blue star.
> And blue stars were not supposed to go supernova ... at least according to
> the models.
Can you give a similar explantion for the formation of so-called quark stars?