Confidence Intervals (easy question)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Goalie_Ca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    intervals
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion revolves around calculating a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of semiconductor dies that pass probing, based on a sample of 365 dies with 201 passing. The user calculates the sample proportion as x_bar = 201/365 = 0.551 and identifies a discrepancy with the book's answer of 0.513 to 0.615. The user also points out an error in the standard deviation formula, emphasizing the need for a square root in the calculation. The confusion regarding the sample size, questioning whether it is 356 or 365, further complicates the issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of confidence intervals in statistics
  • Familiarity with the concept of sample proportions
  • Knowledge of standard deviation calculations
  • Basic grasp of semiconductor wafer testing processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the calculation of confidence intervals using the formula for proportions
  • Learn about the Central Limit Theorem and its application in confidence interval estimation
  • Study the correct application of standard deviation formulas in statistical analysis
  • Explore semiconductor testing methodologies and their statistical implications
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data analysts, quality control engineers, and anyone involved in semiconductor testing and statistical analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Goalie_Ca
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
Easy question but I'm being stupid somewhere. quite frustrating... enough to post it :surprise:

Basically the question is

Semiconductor wafer testing:
365 dies, 201 passed probing.
Assuming stable process calculate a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all dies that pass the probe.

So x_bar = 201/365
std_dev = p*(1-p) = .228
n=356.

the answer in the book is .513,.615 and I'm not getting that. same for the next question and the one after lol.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer you say is in the book can't be right because it is not centered on the sample average: 201/365= 0.551 ((.513+ .615)/2= .564). Also your formula for standard deviation is wrong: you need a squareroot. Although I suspect it is a typo, is n 356 or 365?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K