Urs Schreiber
Aug17-04, 02:03 PM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, A.J. Tolland wrote:\n\n> If you want to explain this peculiarity by saying that Lorentz is\n> always extended to diff, that\'s fine. Maybe even a nice piece of evidence\n> for string theory.\n\nHow is that evidence for string theory?\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, A.J. Tolland wrote:
> If you want to explain this peculiarity by saying that Lorentz is
> always extended to diff, that's fine. Maybe even a nice piece of evidence
> for string theory.
How is that evidence for string theory?
> If you want to explain this peculiarity by saying that Lorentz is
> always extended to diff, that's fine. Maybe even a nice piece of evidence
> for string theory.
How is that evidence for string theory?