Best susy breaking mechanism? [Archive]

jakks

Aug28-04, 03:15 PM

Brian J Flanagan

Aug30-04, 08:50 AM

<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>Jakks wrote:\n\n> From the standpoints of logical simplicity and naturality, what are\n> the most/least attractive possible susy breaking mechanisms in\n> strings?\n\nI like dualities & "hidden" symmetries; have a look at the following\npapers by Witten, Polchinski, Schwarz, de Wit, et al.\n\nhttp://citebase.eprints.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:hep-th/0401243\n\nhttp://citebase.eprints.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:hep-th/0305116\n\nhttp://usparc.ihep.su/spires/find/hep/www?j=PHLTA,B155,47\n\nhttp://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:rR9_STPRg1cJ:physics.usc.edu/Strings95/Proceedings/pdf/9505170.pdf+duality+%22hidden+symmetry%22+witten&hl=en\n\nhttp://cwp.library.ucla.edu/Phase2/Dolan,_Louise@901234567.html\n\nhttp://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1126-6708/2004/02/001\n\nhttp://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0404235\n\nhttp://xxx.arxiv.cornell.edu/abs/hep-th/0403100\n\nhttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?2004hep.th....8057C\n\nhttp://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9508089\n\nhttp://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9410046\n\nhttp://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:-sQwTV9ioPgJ:hcs.harvard.edu/~jus/0302/song.pdf+duality+%22hidden+symmetry%22+witten&hl=en\n\nhttp://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:dQ0WiDTVIBAJ:physics.stanford.edu/kallosh/KalloshBiography2.ps+duality+%22hidden+symmetry%22 +witten&hl=en\n\nhttp://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:TLlAowlbnhcJ:www.hep.umn.edu/~vainshte/Kogan/Integrability/gkk.ps+duality+%22hidden+symmetry%22+witten&hl=en\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form">  View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>Jakks wrote:

> From the standpoints of logical simplicity and naturality, what are
> the most/least attractive possible susy breaking mechanisms in
> strings?

I like dualities & "hidden" symmetries; have a look at the following
papers by Witten, Polchinski, Schwarz, de Wit, et al.

http://citebase.eprints.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0401243

http://citebase.eprints.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0305116

http://usparc.ihep.su/spires/find/hep/www?j=PHLTA,B155,47

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:rR9_STPRg1cJ:physics.usc.edu/Strings95/Proceedings/pdf/9505170.pdf+duality+%22hidden+symmetry%22+witten&hl=en

http://cwp.library.ucla.edu/Phase2/Dolan,_Louise@901234567.html

http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1126-6708/2004/02/001

http://arxiv.org/abs/http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0404235

http://xxx.arxiv.cornell.edu/abs/http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0403100

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?2004hep.th....8057C

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9508089

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9410046

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:-sQwTV9ioPgJ:hcs.harvard.edu/~jus/0302/song.pdf+duality+%22hidden+symmetry%22+witten&hl=en

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:dQ0WiDTVIBAJ:physics.stanford.edu/kallosh/KalloshBiography2.ps+duality+%22hidden+symmetry%22 +witten&hl=en

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:TLlAowlbnhcJ:www.hep.umn.edu/~vainshte/Kogan/Integrability/gkk.ps+duality+%22hidden+symmetry%22+witten&hl=en