Riding Verticle Cylinders: A Physics Case Study

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of a motorcycle stuntman riding on the inside walls of a vertical cylinder, focusing on concepts of gravity, friction, centripetal acceleration, and uniform circular motion. Participants explore the mechanics involved in maintaining the stunt and the implications of removing the cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how a motorcycle stuntman can ride inside a vertical cylinder without falling, noting the role of gravity and friction.
  • Another participant suggests that a free body diagram would be more appropriate for analyzing the situation, highlighting the importance of uniform circular motion and centripetal acceleration.
  • Concerns are raised about the effects of removing the cylinder, with speculation that the stuntman would fall if the cylinder were to disappear, indicating a reliance on friction for maintaining the ride.
  • One participant reflects on the necessity of speed for centripetal acceleration and the normal force, emphasizing that without friction, the stuntman would fall.
  • There is a discussion about banked curves and whether it is possible to manage a curve without friction, particularly at a 90-degree angle, concluding that friction is essential in this scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the mechanics involved, with no consensus reached on the implications of removing the cylinder or the role of friction in maintaining the stunt. Multiple viewpoints on the necessity of speed and friction are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific values such as the radius of the cylinder and the coefficient of friction, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the conditions under which the stunt can be performed and the effects of varying speeds.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying physics, particularly in the areas of mechanics, circular motion, and the effects of forces in non-standard situations.

Cyrus
Messages
3,246
Reaction score
17
Hi, I was just about to finish the chapter on gravity and gravitation in my physics book when I came across (in another physics book) an example problem that showed a motorcycle stuntman riding on the inside walls of a right vertical cylinder. I wondered how it was possible for him to to around the cylinder without falling, gravity acts down on him, and there is friction, but the obviously the friction cannot be great enoght to support his weight when he is horizontal like that. It says he's on a cylinder of radius 15meters. So what I did was use the orbital velocity equation [tex]sqrt(g*r)[/tex], where g is 9.81m/s and R is 15m, and go an anwser of 12, which is what the book said the anwser was. I am interested in knowning two things. First, if I calculated the anwser correctly or got a similar anwser by chance. Second, I would like an explanation on the physics behind that kind of situation. I can kind of see how he would have an orbital velocity, but when we derived the orbital velocity equation, we assumed that we were throwing a rock faster and faster until fell at the same rate the Earth curved away from it. Here, the motorcycle man isint really falling around the Earth continually is he, since he is going around a vertical tube over and over again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Umm, I think I am wrong, I looked under the section that the problem is listed and it says uniform circular motion and centripetal acceleration, so I guess a free body diagram would be more appropriate in this situation. The problems on Newtons law of gravitation came later. It also states that the friction coefficitent between the tires and the wall is 1.1 Maybe this gives you more information to the problem. I will wait for your explanation, but now I am also thinking to myself, does this mean that he can be vertical with the wall, I guess so, since its a cylinder and not a sphere, he has to be vertical at all times. So say we were in a vaccume, and we instantly made the cylinder go away, would he sit there hovering above the ground as he went around at his determined speed, or would he just crash down to the ground the instant the cylinder is gone? My gut tells me he would come crashing down, so Is the friction force really what cuases him not to fall over? Hmm I don't think it can be because it is also dependent on how fast he's going. If he does not go fast enough he will fall also.
 
Last edited:
Sorry about wasting a post, I found an anwser at the website http://physics.unomaha.edu/Sowell/Phys1110/Tests/Test2/Test2Fall02/answers.html Which is the same problem from the book. I did the problem total wrong, tisk tisk :-( , but now it makes sense to me, take away the wall, the man falls to his demise, and the speed is necessary because it will account for his centripetal acceleration, which is needed to dermine the normal force he causes on the wall. I guess in a case like this friction is critical, without it he would fall down. I was wondering about friction because i know that in certin situations, ie banked curves, you can have no friction and still manage the curve, and I was wondering if it were possible for that to be true when the angle of bank is 90degrees. I guess it can't be since the normal force will provide no support for the motorcycle, and thus, only friction can keep him from sliding down. Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
cyrusabdollahi said:
Sorry about wasting a post, I found an anwser at the website http://physics.unomaha.edu/Sowell/Phys1110/Tests/Test2/Test2Fall02/answers.html Which is the same problem from the book. I did the problem total wrong, tisk tisk :-( , but now it makes sense to me, take away the wall, the man falls to his demise, and the speed is necessary because it will account for his centripetal acceleration, which is needed to dermine the normal force he causes on the wall. I guess in a case like this friction is critical, without it he would fall down. I was wondering about friction because i know that in certin situations, ie banked curves, you can have no friction and still manage the curve, and I was wondering if it were possible for that to be true when the angle of bank is 90degrees. I guess it can't be since the normal force will provide no support for the motorcycle, and thus, only friction can keep him from sliding down. Is this correct?

To answer you r question, look at the equation:
[tex]\mu F_n = m\frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]
[tex]\mu mg = m\frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]
[tex]\mu g = \frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]
[tex]\mu g = \frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]

if the friction is not there, then [tex]\mu = 0[/tex]
and the whole system just collapses. Rendering the ride unridable, and making evil's job impossible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K