Is x not in A or B AND not in C?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kernelpenguin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Set theory Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the logical equivalence of set theory expressions involving the variable x and sets A, B, and C. Specifically, the expressions x not in (A union B) minus (A intersection B) and x not in C are analyzed for their equivalence. The participants conclude that negation in set theory switches conjunction and disjunction, leading to the identification of potential counterexamples to validate or invalidate the proposed equivalences. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding set operations and logical deductions in proving statements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory concepts such as union, intersection, and set difference.
  • Familiarity with logical operators including conjunction (AND) and disjunction (OR).
  • Basic knowledge of negation in mathematical logic.
  • Experience with constructing and analyzing logical proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of set operations in detail, focusing on union, intersection, and set difference.
  • Learn about logical equivalences and how to apply them in mathematical proofs.
  • Explore counterexample construction techniques to test the validity of mathematical statements.
  • Investigate the implications of De Morgan's laws in set theory and logic.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying set theory and logic, as well as educators and anyone interested in enhancing their understanding of mathematical proofs and logical reasoning.

kernelpenguin
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove something small with set theory and since I'm new to it, I've run into a problem. I can't understand what the following means exactly and how to proceed further. Or where the mistake is, if there is one. I think there is, because it seems... freaky.

[tex]x\notin\left(\left(\left(A\cup B\right)\setminus\left(A\cap B\right)\right)\cap C\right)[/tex]
[tex]x\notin\left(\left(A\cup B\right)\setminus\left(A\cap B\right)\right)\wedge x\notin C[/tex]
[tex]\left(x\notin\left(A\cup B\right)\wedge x\in\left(A\cap B\right)\right)\wedge x\notin C[/tex]
[tex]\left(\left(\left(x\notin A\right)\vee\left(x\notin B\right)\right)\wedge\left(\left(x\in A\right)\wedge\left(x\in B\right)\right)\right)\wedge x\notin C[/tex]

I'd post the entire thing of which this is a small part of, but that's my homework and I don't want to get into the habit of having other people do my homework for me. Plus I want to learn how and why it works, not just do it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
consider this

x is not an element of UnV
x is not an element of U AND x is not an element of V

you've said those two statements are equivalent (I think, since you've not actually said what your deductions are from line to line). find a counter example to show this is false.

negation switches conjunction and disjunction, or union and intersection.

similar observations hold for the other steps in your reasoning.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
4K