Looking for a Beginner-Friendly QM Book?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Farn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for beginner-friendly books on quantum mechanics (QM), particularly those that address the issues with classical physics that led to the development of quantum theory. Participants express a preference for resources that are accessible to those with limited mathematical background.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks recommendations for QM books that are suitable for beginners and discuss the transition from classical to quantum physics.
  • Another participant suggests "The Odd Quantum" by Sam Treiman as a painless introduction to the subject.
  • A follow-up question is raised regarding the depth of content covered in the suggested book.
  • A later reply describes the book as intermediate between popular treatments and introductory textbooks, noting that it presents basic equations with explanations but lacks detailed derivations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for beginner-friendly resources, but there is no consensus on the best book or the depth of content that should be covered.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not specified particular mathematical prerequisites or the extent of prior knowledge required for the recommended book.

Farn
Can anyone recommend a good book to start with? Preferable one that oriented towards teaching the QM newbie. It should discuss the problems with classical that led the development of quantum. I'd say I have a pretty good conceptual mind, but I'm not much of a mathematician.

Anything out there for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The most painless introduction I've seen is "the odd quantum" by sam treiman. Here's the link to amazon.

 
Great, painless is good.
On the other side though, about how in depth would you say it gets?
 
Originally posted by Farn
Great, painless is good.
On the other side though, about how in depth would you say it gets?

It's intermediate between popular treatments and introductory textbooks: Basic equations are presented with explanations but no derivations. It's a great little book written by a master. You won't be disappointed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 473 ·
16
Replies
473
Views
34K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
14K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
16K