Top Physics Authorities and their Must-Read Books: Hawking, Greene, and More!

  • Thread starter Thread starter BIGBANGSingh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying current authorities in the field of physics and their notable publications, focusing on both popular science and technical textbooks. Participants explore the distinction between popular authors and those contributing to academic research.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest Stephen Hawking and Brian Greene as authorities, citing their popular science books.
  • Others challenge the classification of Hawking and Greene as authorities, arguing that real physics is not represented by popular science literature.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of technical textbooks, listing several respected authors and their works in physics.
  • Another participant argues that true authorities are those actively publishing in scientific journals, suggesting that the community should focus on current research rather than historical figures.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of authority in physics, with some asserting that it does not rely on individual figures but rather on consensus within the scientific community.
  • One participant questions the meaning of "comprehensive" in the context of the discussion, implying a need for clarity on what constitutes a respected author.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on what constitutes an authority in physics, with no consensus reached on the criteria for authority or the significance of popular versus technical works.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights varying interpretations of authority in physics, the distinction between popular science and technical literature, and the importance of current research contributions. There is also ambiguity regarding the term "comprehensive" as it relates to the types of books being discussed.

BIGBANGSingh
Physics "Authorities"

Who are the current "authorities" in the field of physics, and what books have they written (preferably comprehensive)? Right now I can think of Stephen Hawking w/ "The Universe in a Nutshell," & Brian Greene w/ "The Elegant Universe." Please continue to add to this list...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't generally call either of those fellows "authorities." Real physics has nothing to do with paperback pop-sci books.

- Warren
 
I completely disagree with you Chroot, the Brief History of Time was first issued as a hardback not a paperback (actually if anyone has the first edition of this book, due to it's limited print run it's worth a lot more than you would of thought).

Stephen Hawking is very respected in cosmology especially quantum cosmology, though most physicists think that Brief History of Time isn't up to much even as a pop-sci book.

Brain Greene's hardly a physics giant, but I'm not sure how well he's respected in his field -string theory.
 
Unfortunately, I'm looking for comprehensive books. So then, who are the most respected authors in the physics field?
 
I don't know what you mean by 'comprehensive,' but I assume you mean 'technical.' Some of the best textbooks around are:

Fundamentals of Physics by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker
Modern Quantum Mechanics by J. J. Sakurai
Quarks and Leptons by Halzen and Martin
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths
Introduction to Elementary Particles by Griffiths
Introduction to Electrodynamics by Griffiths
Mathematical Methods of Physics by Matthews and Walker
Spacetime Physics by Taylor and Wheeler
General Relativity by Wald
Gravitation by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler
Lectures on Physics by Feynman

etc., etc.

- Warren
 
Chroot,
LOL, that looks like the list I was thinging about, Perhaps you should add Jackson in the ElectroMagnetism list.
 
LOL at Chroot!

All you did was copy a list of popular physics textbook authors. The real physics authorities are the ones publishing papers in scientific journals. Read arXiv.org every day for three months. After a while you'll start to realize who knows their sh:t.

eNtRopY
 
But physics doesn't really bow down to authority anyway. Saying Witten, Ashtekar, or [name your own hero] doesn't say either what the physics community currently agrees on or what is currently going on in research.

So many cranks (present company excepted) think they have to refute Einstein, when what they really have to refute is current-day relativity. Same with Darwin. Finding an embarrassing quote from the great man doesn't affect current science at all.
 
Wouldn't the "Authorities", in physics, be the consensus of the persons, working/publishing, in the physics communities?
 
  • #10
Originally posted by eNtRopY
LOL at Chroot!

All you did was copy a list of popular physics textbook authors. The real physics authorities are the ones publishing papers in scientific journals. Read arXiv.org every day for three months. After a while you'll start to realize who knows their sh:t.

eNtRopY
I'm aware. However, BIGBANGSingh asked for authors of books. Perhaps you should take the time to read the thread.

- Warren
 
  • #11


Originally posted by BIGBANGSingh
Please continue to add to this list...

Make me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K