Calculating Weight Changes in a Looping Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tanya Back
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Weight
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the scale reading of a 100 kg pilot at the bottom of a loop in a plane traveling at 138.88 m/s with a radius of 200 m. The correct approach involves understanding centripetal force and gravitational force. The formula for centripetal acceleration is applied, leading to the conclusion that the scale reading is the sum of gravitational force and the centripetal force required for the loop. The final calculation yields a scale reading of 10623.87 N, confirming the pilot's weight is effectively doubled at the bottom of the loop.

PREREQUISITES
  • Centripetal force calculation
  • Understanding of gravitational force (9.80 m/s²)
  • Basic physics of circular motion
  • Force and acceleration relationship
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about centripetal acceleration formulas
  • Study the effects of gravitational force in circular motion
  • Explore real-world applications of centripetal force in aviation
  • Review problems involving forces in vertical circular motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of forces in circular motion, particularly in aviation contexts.

Tanya Back
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hey!

I tired this question but i don't get it :frown:

A 100 kg pilot sits on a scale, as the plane reaches the bottom of the loop, what does the scale read? The plane is traveling at 138.88 m/s. The radius is 200m

So i did this -->

Fc= Fscale - Fg

(100)(138.88)^2 / 200 = Fscale - 980
Fscale = 10623.87 N

I have no clue if this right..since the teacher never gave us the answer..just the question.. Can someone please help..he said this question mite be on a quiz :frown:

PLz! ...Thank u !

Tanya
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Tanya.

First off, you need to keep straight on the dimensions you're talking about. Weight is a force, for instance, while the 9.80 or 980 is an acceleration.

Second, you need to think about what's going on in the loop. Imagine swinging a rock on the end of a string in a vertical circle. (If you've never done something like that, go do it. It'll help a lot.) How hard does the string pull on your hand as it goes around? If you do it, you'll notice that it pulls harder when the rock is at the bottom of the loop than when it is at the top. You can, in fact, swing it just right so that it doesn't pull at all when it's at the top.

Think of it in terms of centripetal force - the force that acts towards the center of the circle, that's necessary for any object to undergo circular motion. When the rock is at the top, gravity is acting directly towards the center of the circle. If you're swinging it at the right speed, gravity will provide all of the centripetal force necessary, and the string won't have to pull at all - no tension in the string. In that case, at the bottom of the loop, gravity is pulling directly away from the center of the circle. In that case, the string must provide both the centripetal force as well as counteracting gravity - the tension in the string will be twice the weight of the rock. It will vary from zero at the top to 2W at the bottom as it moves through the loop, going up as the rock goes down and vice versa.

For your problem: First, figure out the centripetal acceleration necessary for a loop of that radius at that speed. You should have a formula for that. Once you have it, compare it to gravitational acceleration (9.80 m/s^2). At the bottom of the loop, the acceleration will be g + a(centripetal). Multiply that by the mass of the pilot and you'll have the scale reading you need.

Hope this helps.
 
Thank u Diane

Ohhhh now i see! Thank u Diane :biggrin:

Tanya
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K