Finding the Minimum Frictional Force for a Ladder in Equilibrium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Coldie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a ladder in equilibrium, specifically focusing on calculating the minimum frictional force required to prevent the ladder from slipping. The problem includes variables such as the angle of the ladder, its mass, and the forces acting on it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the forces acting on the ladder, including friction and normal forces. There are attempts to derive equations for the frictional force and questions about the application of previous formulas to this specific scenario.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on focusing directly on the frictional force rather than the coefficient of friction. There is an exploration of equilibrium conditions for torques, and a participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the angle used in their calculations, suggesting a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of previous exercises that may not apply to this problem, indicating potential gaps in understanding how different scenarios affect the calculations. The discussion also highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the angle of the ladder in relation to the forces involved.

Coldie
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
If a ladder makes an angle with the wall, has a mass m and is uniform in design, show that the minimum force of friction which must exist between the ladder and floor to keep the ladder from slipping is given by

[tex] F_f = \frac{1}{2}mg\tan\theta[/tex]

Now, [tex]\mu = \frac{F_g_x}{F_g_y}[/tex], and in a previous calculation I got [tex]F_g_x = \frac{\frac{L\cos\theta}{2}mg}{L\sin\theta}[/tex] and [tex]F_g_y = mg[/tex], with [tex]L[/tex] being the length of the ladder.

When I plug all this together, I get [tex]\frac{\cot}{2}[/tex], not even close to what I'm intended to get. Can somebody tell me what I'm doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-01Physics-IFall1999/VideoLectures/detail/Video-Segment-Index-for-L-25.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks, that site looks great, but I'm already familiar with the basics behind the ladder problem. The equations that I'm using worked on previous problems, and I'm not sure why I'm not getting the same answer in this particular problem.
 
Coldie said:
When I plug all this together, I get [tex]\frac{\cot}{2}[/tex], not even close to what I'm intended to get. Can somebody tell me what I'm doing wrong?
I'm not sure what you are doing here, but the problem is simple. No need to find [itex]\mu[/itex], since all you need is the frictional force. Assuming there is no friction at the wall, the frictional force must equal the normal force exerted by the wall on the ladder. To find that normal force, apply equilibrium conditions for torques on the ladder about the ground contact point. Note that the angle is with respect to the wall, not the floor.
 
Coldie,

Make sure that the calculations done / formula's found in previous exercises do apply for this problem. If you describe for what exercises the formula's you found apply, we could give you better hint to where, and why your result is not 100%

This is the point where physics requires you to understand what you are doing, in stead of just being a mathematical game.

Greetz,
Leo
 
Doc Al said:
I'm not sure what you are doing here, but the problem is simple. No need to find [itex]\mu[/itex], since all you need is the frictional force. Assuming there is no friction at the wall, the frictional force must equal the normal force exerted by the wall on the ladder. To find that normal force, apply equilibrium conditions for torques on the ladder about the ground contact point. Note that the angle is with respect to the wall, not the floor.
Gah, thank you, that's a big screw-up on my part. Also, since [tex]\theta[/tex] is at the wall pointing downwards, the [tex]\sin[/tex] and [tex]\cos[/tex] functions I'm using would be reversed, since I had been using the angle with respect to the floor! I think this solves my problem! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K