PDA

View Full Version : Einstein and Lambda

TillEulenspiegel
Nov25-04, 03:38 AM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>Question.\nThere are some who claim that DE as a scalar field resolves the "\nmissing mass " problem, but as the DE force is repulsive how could that\naccount for galactic cohesion which is attractive?\n\n------------------------------------------------------------------------\nThis post submitted through the LaTeX-enabled physicsforums.com\nTo view this post with LaTeX images:\nhttp://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=50342#post357187\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form">&nbsp;&nbsp;View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>Question.
There are some who claim that DE as a scalar field resolves the "
missing mass " problem, but as the DE force is repulsive how could that
account for galactic cohesion which is attractive?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This post submitted through the LaTeX-enabled physicsforums.com
To view this post with LaTeX images:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=50342#post357187
TillEulenspiegel
Nov25-04, 03:39 AM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>So then you think that DE would follow sort of an inverse of Newtons\nsquare of the distance or it is a scaler field ( as I believe) where\nthe gradient doesn\'t change , but is rather static. Even a small force\ndifferential at great distances would have an effect over the age of\nthe universe? I.E. The fact that the outer bodies are accelerating\nbecause the FGrav is less over greater distances.\n\nThat still doesn\'t account for the cohesive behavior of Galaxy\'s. With\nthe mass we measure they should fly apart. So there must be something\nwe cannot see of measure ATT. CDM or HDM. The invocation of DE can\nsolve the overall energy budget, but can\'t account for missing mass at\nclose distances.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------------------\nThis post submitted through the LaTeX-enabled physicsforums.com\nTo view this post with LaTeX images:\nhttp://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=50342#post358909\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form">&nbsp;&nbsp;View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>So then you think that DE would follow sort of an inverse of Newtons
square of the distance or it is a scaler field ( as I believe) where
the gradient doesn't change , but is rather static. Even a small force
differential at great distances would have an effect over the age of
the universe? I.E. The fact that the outer bodies are accelerating
because the FGrav is less over greater distances.

That still doesn't account for the cohesive behavior of Galaxy's. With
the mass we measure they should fly apart. So there must be something
we cannot see of measure ATT. CDM or HDM. The invocation of DE can
solve the overall energy budget, but can't account for missing mass at
close distances.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This post submitted through the LaTeX-enabled physicsforums.com
To view this post with LaTeX images:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=50342#post358909