Phillip Helbig
Nov25-04, 04:10 AM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>A note for those of you posting through http://www.physicsforums.com/:\nSeveral posts have been rejected recently since they contain no context.\nA post should quote enough of the post it is replying to so that it can\nbe read self-contained. This might be a problem with the physicsforums\ninterface.\n\nKeep in mind that most folks don\'t read the posts via physicsforums, and\nthat they can show up out of order.\n\n(Physicsforums is an HTML-based system whose posts are gatewayed to\nsci.physics.research and vice versa, at least that is my understanding.\nAs long as this is the case, posts will have to meet the criteria of\nsci.physics.research in order to be approved.)\n\nI would also like the maintainer of the physicsforums website to contact\nme.\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>A note for those of you posting through http://www.physicsforums.com/:
Several posts have been rejected recently since they contain no context.
A post should quote enough of the post it is replying to so that it can
be read self-contained. This might be a problem with the physicsforums
interface.
Keep in mind that most folks don't read the posts via physicsforums, and
that they can show up out of order.
(Physicsforums is an HTML-based system whose posts are gatewayed to
sci.physics.research and vice versa, at least that is my understanding.
As long as this is the case, posts will have to meet the criteria of
sci.physics.research in order to be approved.)
I would also like the maintainer of the physicsforums website to contact
me.
Several posts have been rejected recently since they contain no context.
A post should quote enough of the post it is replying to so that it can
be read self-contained. This might be a problem with the physicsforums
interface.
Keep in mind that most folks don't read the posts via physicsforums, and
that they can show up out of order.
(Physicsforums is an HTML-based system whose posts are gatewayed to
sci.physics.research and vice versa, at least that is my understanding.
As long as this is the case, posts will have to meet the criteria of
sci.physics.research in order to be approved.)
I would also like the maintainer of the physicsforums website to contact
me.