Hold'em poker hands simulation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Erazman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simulation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the odds of being the only player in a Texas Hold'em poker game to receive one of the top 16 starting hands out of a possible 169 hands. Participants explore the mathematical implications of hand rankings, the effects of multiple players on probabilities, and the feasibility of simulations versus analytical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates a 9.467% chance of being dealt a preferred hand but seeks to determine the odds of being the only player with a top hand.
  • Another participant notes that the presence of one player's cards affects the available options for others, complicating the calculation.
  • There is a suggestion that a computer simulation might provide a more accurate assessment of the odds.
  • Some participants argue that the specific hands included in the top 16 may not significantly alter the overall odds, while others contend that the combinations of cards must be considered.
  • One participant highlights that the odds depend on the specific cards held, as certain combinations can limit the possibilities for other players.
  • Another participant mentions that the probability of being dealt a top hand changes with the number of players and their respective hands.
  • There is a discussion about simplifying the analysis by treating equivalent hands as identical, despite the existence of multiple combinations for certain hands.
  • One participant suggests that while statistical programs can calculate probabilities based on known hands, practical play relies more on behavioral cues than on statistical analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of specific hand rankings on the overall odds, and there is no consensus on the best method to calculate the odds of being the only player with a top hand. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy of analytical versus simulation approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the calculations depend on the specific hands chosen and the finite nature of the card deck, which introduces complexity into the probability assessments. The discussion also highlights the limitations of relying solely on statistical methods without considering player behavior.

Erazman
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
you don't even have to know the rules of poker to help me out.. this should be very simple math but i just can't figure it out...

10 players (including me) are dealt 2 cards each.

Of 169 possible starting hands, i only want to play 16 of the best hands (the remaining 153 hands i would fold).

so the setup is simple: my chances of getting a hand that i like is 9.467%.
but the question is: what are my ODDS of me being the only one in the Top 16?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the only thing i know is the obvious: there's a 1:1 chance that ONE of the 10 players will be in the top 16 (if we round off to 10%), but that doesn't give me my answer :(
 
Actually, it can't be done accurately without knowing the actual rankings of the hands -- the fact that person #1 has two cards that make up a top hand affects the odds person #2 can have a top hand (because those two cards aren't available to #2).

The best way to do this, though, is a computer simulation.
 
can it be done at least semi-accurately without a simulation?
 
Depends on what those 16 hands are.
 
s = same suit

AA
KK
QQ
JJ
AKs
TT
AQs
AJs
AK
KQs
99
QJs
KJs
ATs
AQ
KTs
 
would it really matter which hands belong in top 16? theoretically if the rules of poker all of a sudden changed, and different hands became "better" than others, the answer should still be the same should it not
 
But there are more than 16 hands right? There are 6 ways to get an AA hand, 6 for a KK etc. Also, AKs there are 4 of these. 4 AQs, etc. This makes it a bit more complicated, unless you did something to simplify it that I did not see.
 
Consider, as a hypothetical game, one where all sixteen of the best hands contain the ace of spades. Clearly, in this game, if you have one of these 16 best hands, it's absolutely impossible for anyone else as well.


Even with these sixteen hands, the odds still depend on which one you have -- having an ace and a king in your hand makes it harder for everyone else to have one of these top hands than, say, having a pair of nines.


I'm assuming a finite number of cards, though... probably one deck.
 
  • #10
To further expand on the subject, the probability of 9.467 could only be used in the case of one player. Since you have a game of n number of players each dealt hand changes the probability of the remaining hands. Also in a ten person game the ratio is not 1:1 as probability can not be 100%. If there is a 1:7 chance of winning a pepsi give away will I win? Would I only win once?

To answer your question completely would require more statistics than I know (as I know none). I will look into it though.
 
  • #11
mattmns said:
But there are more than 16 hands right? There are 6 ways to get an AA hand, 6 for a KK etc. Also, AKs there are 4 of these. 4 AQs, etc. This makes it a bit more complicated, unless you did something to simplify it that I did not see.

yes its all simplified.. ace of hearts mixed with ace of diamonds has the same value to me as ace of clubs mixed with ace of spades.. so i count it as one.. there's 169 total 2 card combinations if you look at it that way.

and Hurkyl, if i have KK, then someones chances of getting KK as well are split in half, but their chance of sitting in the "top 16" that i listed is only SLIGHTLY reduced by an insignificant amount that i really don't care about..
 
Last edited:
  • #12
There are programs that can calculate the chances of other people having aces if you get dealt one (and it can obviously be expanded to include whatever you want). This information is always useless when playing though because you can get more reliable information by just paying attention to betting patterns and mannerisms.

kreil
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K