Electromagnetic induction and conducting rods

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving electromagnetic induction with two conducting rods rotating in a magnetic field. The participants are exploring how to calculate the angular speed of the rods based on the potential difference required to create a spark across a gap between them.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are discussing the use of a formula relating voltage potential to velocity, magnetic field, and the length of the rods. There are attempts to derive angular speed from given values and to clarify the contributions of each rod to the potential difference.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between the angular speed and the potential difference, while others are questioning the correctness of their calculations. There is an acknowledgment of differing results, with some suggesting that adjustments to the approach may be necessary.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the rods are rotating in opposite directions and that the fixed ends are at the same electric potential. There is also mention of the specific potential difference required for a spark and the implications of the rods' lengths in the calculations.

apchemstudent
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
Two 0.68 m long conducting rods are rotating at the same speed in opposite directions, and both are perpendicular to a 4.7 T magnetic field. As the drawing shows, the ends of these rods come to within 1.0mm of each other as they rotate. More-over, the fixed ends about which the rods are rotating are connected by a wire, so these ends are at the same electric potential. If a potential difference of 4.5*10^3 V is required to cause a 1.0 mm spark in air, what is the angular speed (in rad/s) of the rods when a spark jumps across the gap?

Is it possible to still use the formula

Voltage potential = velocity * magnetic field * length of rod ?
v = r*angular speed

(4.5*10^3)/(4.7*.68) = v = r * angular speed

i got the angular speed as 2070 rad/sec. Is this correct how i solved the question? if not can you correct me. Thanks
 

Attachments

  • question.jpg
    question.jpg
    7.8 KB · Views: 667
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that the base of each rotating rod is at the same potential, but they move in opposite directions so that one will contribute V/2 and the other -V/2, and the potential difference is V = 4500 V.
 
Astronuc said:
Remember that the base of each rotating rod is at the same potential, but they move in opposite directions so that one will contribute V/2 and the other -V/2, and the potential difference is V = 4500 V.

The answer in the back said 2100 rad/sec. At first i thought the same way with V/2, but i only got 1035 rad/sec. So doubling it will bring the answer closer. However though, is this the proper way to solve the problem, as posted from above?
 
apchemstudent said:
Is it possible to still use the formula

Voltage potential = velocity * magnetic field * length of rod ? v = r*angular speed
Yes, but the speed is a function of l, so you have to apply a bit of calculus:

[tex]dE = vBdl \rightarrow E = \int_0^L \omega lBdl = \frac{1}{2}\omega BL^2[/tex]

Note: the other rod is rotating with speed [itex]-\omega[/itex] so the potential from the centre to the end is [itex]- \frac{1}{2}\omega BL^2[/itex]

The condition for spark is Potential Difference = 4.5kV: [itex]E_L - E_R = 4,500[/itex].

AM
 
Last edited:
Also note that one can avoid integration by dealing only with the angular velocity as it is independent of the length.

The angle swept by the rod in one second = [tex]\omega[/tex]

So the area swept by the rod in one second, [tex]A=\frac{1}{2}L^2\omega[/tex]

[tex]E = -\frac {d\phi} {dt} = -B\frac {dA} {dt}[/tex]


[tex]E = -\frac {1} {2}BL^2\omega[/tex]

Regards,
Gamma.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K