Universe is 4% baryonic, 23% Dark matter, 73% Dark energy?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the classification of the composition of the universe, specifically the proportions of baryonic matter, dark matter, and dark energy. Participants explore whether these proportions are considered theory or fact, delving into the evidence supporting these claims and the definitions of scientific terms.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the stated proportions of the universe's composition are theory or fact.
  • Another participant argues that while it is a theory, there is substantial evidence supporting it, including measurements of mass density and the geometry of the universe.
  • Evidence cited includes the comparison of visible light to mass in large scale structures and the implications of cosmic microwave background (CMB) data.
  • Dark matter is described as a missing mass that does not emit visible light, with some suggesting it may consist of weakly interacting particles.
  • Dark energy is discussed as a force driving the universe's expansion, with its nature still not fully understood, potentially linked to vacuum energy.
  • A later post provides definitions of "fact" and "theory" from the National Academy of Sciences, emphasizing that scientific understanding is subject to change and that theories are comprehensive explanations based on extensive evidence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the proportions of baryonic matter, dark matter, and dark energy are supported by evidence, but there is no consensus on whether they should be classified strictly as theory or fact. The discussion reflects multiple viewpoints on the definitions and implications of these terms.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the evolving nature of scientific understanding and the distinction between observations and theoretical frameworks. The discussion does not resolve the complexities surrounding the definitions of fact and theory in the context of cosmology.

Glenn
Is it theory or fact that the universe is 4% baryonic, 23% Dark matter, 73% Dark energy.

Theory right?

-Glenn
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Everything is theory. That particular theory, however, has pretty decent evidence in its favor. The mass density of the universe is measurable by several methods. The most basic method is by comparing the ratio of visible light to mass in large scale structures, such as galactic clusters. For decades evidence has consistently mounted that there is not enough ordinary matter to account for the 'flat' geometry indicated by measurements [especially WMAP data of the CMB anisotropy]. The missing mass been named 'dark matter' because it is not emitting visible light. It may or may not be baryonic matter. The consensus is that most of it is a yet to be identified form weakly interacting particles similar to neutrinos.

Dark energy is the force that drives the expansion of the universe. Like dark matter, its nature is not fully understood. It may simply be the zero point energy of the vacuum. Expansion is measured through the redshifts of distant galaxies and the apparent brightness of Type 1a supernovae found in them. These measurements suggest that the expansion of the universe is accelerating.

The geometry of spacetime [curvature] is deduced from measurements of temperature fluctuations [anisotropy] in the cosmic microwave background [CMB] radiation, a remnant of the Big Bang. Current data indicates the universe is flat or very slightly open.
 
Last edited:
Chronos said:
Everything is theory. That particular theory, however, has pretty decent evidence in its favor.

An accurate statement.
 
worth mentioning...
scientific definitions of fact & theory from the National Academy of Science...

Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as "true." Truth in science, however, is never final, and what is accepted as a fact today may be modified or even discarded tomorrow.

Theory: In science, a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses. ... In science, theories do not turn into facts through the accumulation of evidence. Rather, theories are the end points of science. They are understandings that develop from extensive observation, experimentation, and creative reflection. They incorporate a large body of scientific facts, laws, tested hypotheses, and logical inferences.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
9K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K