Funniest Theory Ever: A Small Young Universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saturnalia=Christmas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around unconventional theories regarding the Earth's motion and shape, particularly focusing on the notion of a non-rotating Earth and other fringe theories like the hollow Earth. Participants share links to various websites and express their amusement and skepticism towards these ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight claims that no experiments have proven the Earth is moving, suggesting that this undermines established scientific understanding.
  • One participant argues that the alleged rotational speed of the Earth must decrease with latitude, presenting this as a logical impossibility for certain historical events like aerial bombing in WWII.
  • Another participant expresses frustration over the persistence of what they consider nonsensical theories, questioning the reasoning of those who promote them.
  • References are made to the Flat Earth Society and the hollow Earth theory, with participants finding humor in these ideas and sharing links to related content.
  • There is a mention of historical figures associated with the hollow Earth theory, suggesting a blend of historical context with contemporary fringe beliefs.
  • One participant comments on the misunderstanding of basic concepts, such as the shape of the Earth, indicating a belief that some proponents of these theories cannot interpret scientific data correctly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express disagreement with the theories being discussed, often ridiculing them. However, there is no consensus on the validity of these theories, as the discussion remains largely critical and exploratory.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on interpretations of scientific principles that may not align with mainstream scientific consensus, and there are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of evidence presented by proponents of these theories.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may interest those exploring unconventional theories about the Earth, as well as individuals curious about the reactions these theories provoke within the scientific community.

Saturnalia=Christmas
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
http://www.fixedearth.com/a_small_young_universe.htm :smile: :smile:

kind of sad too if u think about it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I like this part the best:
some f****** crackpot said:
Remember, no experiment has ever shown the Earth to be moving. Add to that the fact that the alleged rotational speed we've all been taught as scientific fact MUST decrease every inch or mile one goes north or south of the equator, and it becomes readily apparent that such things as accurate aerial bombing in WWII (down a chimney from 25000 feet with a plane going any direction at high speed) would have been impossible if calculated on an Earth moving below at several hundred MPH and changing constantly with the latitude. (You can see several such logical impossibilities treated in THE EARTH IS NOT MOVING.)

This is really funny... :smile:
 
How do people like these get to write down so much nonsense before one sensible human being shows them that they're wrong ? Or is it that they will refuse to see light even if you shine it at their faces ?
 
Mr. Hall does know his Bible. :redface:
 
Remember, no experiment has ever shown the Earth to be moving. Add to that the fact that the alleged rotational speed we've all been taught as scientific fact MUST decrease every inch or mile one goes north or south of the equator, and it becomes readily apparent that such things as accurate aerial bombing in WWII (down a chimney from 25000 feet with a plane going any direction at high speed) would have been impossible if calculated on an Earth moving below at several hundred MPH and changing constantly with the latitude. (You can see several such logical impossibilities treated in THE EARTH IS NOT MOVING.)


LOOOL ... this is indeed real funny.

I wonder if this guy ever went to college, or at least graduated from high school?
 
That is the homepage for the Flat-earther's. You mean you don't have this on your favorites list?
 
Last edited:
The non-rotating Earth is certainly a fine catch in the sea of theory. I am particularly fond of the hollow Earth theory, first proposed by Sir Edmund Halley [yes, THE Halley, the comet dude] and whose cause was advanced by other notable historical figures, like Leonhard Euler [yes, THE Euler, the math dude].
http://www.unmuseum.org/hollow.htm
It's hilarious.
 
Funny source said:
It is, according to "round Earth" theory, orbiting the sun at a radius of around five-hundred million kilometers.

Yes,they can't even read the numbers... :-p

The Earth is not ROUND,it is curved...

Daniel.
 
  • #10
Moneer81 said:
If you want to see something else funny of that sort, then you should check out the flat Earth society. I couldn't find their official website (I think its down) but check out this website about them:

http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/FlatEarth'society.htm

Oh please tell me they are joking. I mean, I've heard some pretty odd crackpot theories, but none so easily disprovable as this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K