Need help with EM/Jackson problem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pmb_phy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving problem 1.2 from J.D. Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics - 2nd Ed." which involves demonstrating the relationship between the Dirac delta function and a Gaussian function in an orthogonal coordinate system. The key equation to prove is δ(x - x') = δ(u - u')δ(v - v')δ(w - w')UVW, utilizing the limit of the Gaussian function D(α;x,y,z) as α approaches zero. Participants emphasize the transformation of coordinates and the concept of the delta function as the inverse of a volume element, leading to the conclusion that the delta function must adjust according to the Jacobian of the transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac delta function and its properties
  • Familiarity with Gaussian functions and their limits
  • Knowledge of orthogonal coordinate systems and Jacobians
  • Basic principles of multivariable calculus and transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirac delta function in various coordinate systems
  • Learn about Gaussian integrals and their applications in physics
  • Explore the concept of Jacobians in coordinate transformations
  • Review multivariable calculus techniques for handling limits and transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electrodynamics, as well as mathematicians interested in advanced calculus and coordinate transformations.

pmb_phy
Messages
2,950
Reaction score
1
In Classical Electrodynamics - 2nd Ed., J.D. Jackson on page 50 there is a problem I need help with. Its problem 1.2 which states

The Dirac delta function in three dimensions can be taken as the improper limit as [itex]\alpha \rightarrow 0[/itex] of the Gaussian function

[tex]D(\alpha;x,y,z) = (2\pi)^{-3/2} \alpha^{-3} exp[-\frac{1}{2\alpha^2}(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)][/tex]

Consider a general orthogonal coordinate system specified by the surfaces, u = constant, v = constant, w = constant, with length elements du/U, dv/V, dw/W in the three perpendicular directions. Show that

[itex]\delta[/itex](x - x') = [itex]\delta[/itex](u - u')[itex]\delta[/itex](v - v')[itex]\delta[/itex](w - w')UVW

by considering the limit of the above Gaussian. Note that as [itex]\alpha \rightarrow 0[/itex] only the infinitesimal length element need be used for the distance between the points in the exponent.

I can't seem to get started on this one. Note that [tex]D(\alpha;x,y,z)[/tex] is the product of three Gaussian functions i.e.

[tex]D(\alpha;x,y,z)[/tex] = G(x)G(y)G(z)

The product UVW reminds me of a Jacobian but I'm not quite sure how. :-p

Any thoughts/solutions/answers? I want to know the answer more than I want to be walked through it with hints (I have hundreds of more problems to work through besides this one which I gave up on). Thanks.

Pete
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT:( :-p )
[tex]\iiint_{R^{3}} \lim_{\alpha\rightarrow 0} [D(\alpha;x,y,z)] \ dx \ dy \ dz[/tex]

[tex]=\iiint_{R^{3}} \lim_{\alpha\rightarrow 0} [D(\alpha;x-x',y-y',z-z')] \ d(x-x') \ d(y-y') \ d(z-z') =1[/tex]

Now make the change of coordinates...

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
Pete -- Think of a delta function as the inverse of a volume element, so if the volume at a point changes by dx dy dz -> dx dy dz/UVW, the delta function must transform as advertised.

More detail: as alpha-> zero, the Gaussian gets very narrow, and the transformation from (x,y,z) to (u,v,w) reduces to a constant one. So, the factor x*x + y*y + z*z in the original Gaussian, becomes, from dx=du/U, (u/U)**2 + (v/V)**2 + (w/W) **2. The rest is a bit of algebra.

All a delta function cares about is its own point -- the rest be damned.

Regards,
R
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
92
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
789
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K