Is there a fundamental connection between energy, momentum, and mass in physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the fundamental relationship between energy, momentum, and mass in physics, emphasizing their conservation laws and interconnections. It highlights that in special relativity (SR), the four-momentum's space coordinates represent momentum while the time coordinate represents energy. In quantum mechanics (QM), the momentum operator is defined as -ih d/dx and the energy operator as ih d/dt. The conversation also touches on classical mechanics with the equation p=mv, suggesting a potential conversion between time and space units, and introduces Noether's theorem, linking energy conservation to time translation symmetry and momentum conservation to space translation symmetry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity (SR) principles
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics (QM) operators
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics, specifically the momentum equation p=mv
  • Basic comprehension of Noether's theorem and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Noether's theorem in physics
  • Study the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations of mechanics
  • Explore the Lorentz transformation and its effects on time and space
  • Investigate the mass-energy-momentum equivalence principle in detail
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of energy, momentum, and mass in both classical and modern physics.

StatusX
Homework Helper
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2
Mass-energy equivalence is fundamental in relativity, but it seems like energy and momentum are also different aspects of the same thing. They've each got very important conservation laws. In SR, the space coordinates of the four-momentum give the momentum while the time coordinate gives energy. In QM, -ih d/dx is the momentum operator, and ih d/dt is the energy operator. P=h/wavelength and E=h/period. It seems that what momentum is to space, (mass-) energy is to time. What is behind this symmetry? Is there a mass-energy-momentum equivalence principal?

Also, I notice that p=mv classically, where v is in units of distance/time. It almost looks like v is a conversion from time units to space units, where mass-energy is the time unit and momentum is the space unit. Is this a valid way of looking at it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
StatusX said:
Mass-energy equivalence is fundamental in relativity, but it seems like energy and momentum are also different aspects of the same thing. They've each got very important conservation laws. In SR, the space coordinates of the four-momentum give the momentum while the time coordinate gives energy. In QM, -ih d/dx is the momentum operator, and ih d/dt is the energy operator. P=h/wavelength and E=h/period. It seems that what momentum is to space, (mass-) energy is to time. What is behind this symmetry? Is there a mass-energy-momentum equivalence principal?

Also, I notice that p=mv classically, where v is in units of distance/time. It almost looks like v is a conversion from time units to space units, where mass-energy is the time unit and momentum is the space unit. Is this a valid way of looking at it?

You are on the right general track. You might want to look at Wikipedia's article on theorem[/URL]

The derivation of Noether's theorem requires that one use the Lagrangian or Hamiltonian formulation of physics - one way of describing this is that physics is described by the principle of "least action". There is a much more formal definition on the wikipedia web page - it's formal to the point of unintelligibility to the non-Phd, unfortunately.

Anyway, given this basic formulation, one can say that energy conservation is associated with time translation symmetry, and that momentum conservation is associated with space translation symmetry.

Because the Lorentz transform "mixes" time and space together, it also "mixes" momentum and energy together.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K