Solving Physics Equation: "v=m1v1+m2v2/(m1+m2)"

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving momentum and energy conservation, specifically analyzing the equation v=\frac{m_1v_1+m_2v_2}{m_1+m_2} and related expressions. Participants are exploring the implications of these equations in the context of a collision involving two masses and a spring.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive expressions for velocity and displacement using conservation of momentum and energy principles. There is uncertainty about the correct application of these principles, particularly regarding the interaction between the masses and the spring.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided their calculations and reasoning, while others express uncertainty about the correctness of their approaches. There is an ongoing exploration of how to properly account for the energy in the system, with no explicit consensus reached on the final interpretations.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes that the problem does not specify certain conditions, such as the relationship between the variables, leading to confusion in deriving the final expressions. Additionally, there are references to missing resources, such as textbooks, which may hinder the discussion.

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
The question is here:
http://home.earthlink.net/~suburban-xrisis/physics001.jpg

For a...
[tex]v=\frac{m_1v_1+m_2v_2}{m_1+m_2}[/tex]

for b...
[tex]x_m=\sqrt{\frac{m_1(v_1-v_2)^2}{k}}[/tex]

for c...
[tex].5kx_m^2=.5m_1v^2[/tex]
[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{kx_m^2}{m_1}}[/tex]

however the problem doesn't say in terms of [tex]x_m[/tex]
I'm not sure what to do. If I plugged in b, it would give me v=v

not quite sure
is that right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
the link isn't working, state the problem or fix the link
 
http://home.earthlink.net/~suburban-xrisis/physics001.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
UrbanXrisis said:
For a...
[tex]v=\frac{m_1v_1+m_2v_2}{m_1+m_2}[/tex]
this is right


for b...
[tex]x_m=\sqrt{\frac{m_1(v_1-v_2)^2}{k}}[/tex]
show your work,
I got a different answer using conservation of energy, I'm assuming m1 and m2 are moving horizontally wrt the ground so gravity is not a factor (its hard to tell from the diagram)

Evaluating the energy before the collision and at the moment of the springs max compression, i get

[tex]\frac{1}{2}m_1{v_1}^2 \ + \ \frac{1}{2}m_2{v_2}^2 = \frac{1}{2}k{x_m}^2 \ + \ \frac{1}{2}(m_1 + m_2){v_f}^2[/tex]

substituting the value calculated in (a) for [itex]v_f[/itex], this becomes

[tex]\frac{1}{2}m_1{v_1}^2 \ + \ \frac{1}{2}m_2{v_2}^2 = \frac{1}{2}k{x_m}^2 \ + \ \frac{1}{2}(m_1 + m_2) \frac{(m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2)^2}{(m_1 + m_2)^2}[/tex]

after all the algebra and simplifying my result is

[tex]x_m = \sqrt{ \frac{ m_1 m_2 (v_1 - v_2)^2}{k(m_1 + m_2)} }[/tex]

I think this is right although I'm not %100 sure since I don't have my book with me


for c...
[tex].5kx_m^2=.5m_1v^2[/tex]
[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{kx_m^2}{m_1}}[/tex]

however the problem doesn't say in terms of [tex]x_m[/tex]
I'm not sure what to do. If I plugged in b, it would give me v=v
It looks like you tried to use energy... The thing you have to keep in mind when using conservation of energy, is that you have to evaluate the whole system. In this case m1 and m2 as well as the spring are part of the system, so you can't break them up. Your equation says that all the energy from the spring goes into the kinetic energy of m1, but this isn't true. The spring pushes on m1, but by Newton's 3rd law, m1 pushes equally hard on the spring. m2 is connected to the spring, so its energy is affected too.

I treated this as another conservation of momentum problem although now starting from the point when both masses are stuck together

letting [itex]{v_1}_i[/itex] & [itex]{v_1}_f[/itex] be the velocity of m1 before and after the collision respectifully ( same notation goes for m2 ) and letting [itex]v_f[/itex] indicate the velocity calculated in part a, I get

[tex](m_1 + m_2)v_f = m_1 {v_1}_f + m_2 {v_2}_f[/tex]

[tex](m_1 + m_2)\frac{m_1 {v_1}_i + m_2 {v_2}_i}{m_1 + m_2} = m_1 {v_1}_f + m_2 {v_2}_f[/tex]

solving for [itex]{v_1}_f[/itex] i get

[tex]{v_1}_f = {v_1}_i + \frac{m_2({v_2}_i - {v_2}_f)}{m_1}[/tex]

the same can be done for [itex]{v_2}_f[/itex]

I think this is the answer, although I am not %100 sure
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K