Just a general probablility question

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter semidevil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the probabilities associated with tossing a fair coin, particularly focusing on whether repeated identical tosses would yield a 50/50 split of heads and tails. Participants explore the implications of tossing a coin under controlled conditions and the nature of randomness in probability experiments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether consistently tossing a coin in the same manner would result in exactly 5 heads and 5 tails after 10 tosses, or 50 heads and 50 tails after 100 tosses.
  • Another participant notes that the results of tossing a fair coin n times follow a binomial distribution, providing a mathematical formula for calculating the probability of k heads.
  • Some participants argue that if a coin is tossed in exactly the same way each time, it could lead to the same outcome (either all heads or all tails), challenging the assumption of randomness.
  • One participant suggests that a hypothetical perfect machine could theoretically produce consistent results, but acknowledges that practical limitations would prevent this from occurring.
  • Another participant reflects on the paradox of achieving a 50/50 split, concluding that a machine capable of perfect consistency would eliminate the randomness necessary for probability experiments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether identical tosses would yield a balanced outcome. There is no consensus on the implications of controlled tossing versus random outcomes.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexities of defining randomness and the influence of physical variables on outcomes, suggesting that perfect control over the tossing mechanism may not be achievable in practice.

semidevil
Messages
156
Reaction score
2
this is what got me thinking...it might be a bit dumb, but...uh...yea.

haha.

ok, so given a fair coin, there is 1/2 chance to get heads or tail when tossed. since each toss in the air is independent, there is always 1/2 chance.

so if you set up some kind of system to flip the coin, everytime the coin is tossed, it is tossed the same way, i.e, same speed, spin, height, same landing...basically, it is just tossed the exact same way, and there is no human error or anything.

so if I toss it 10x, will it get 5 heads and 5 tails? and will I toss 100x, will it get 50 and 50.

So what I'm asking is, whenever they say something has a 50% chance, when you do your experiement the absolutly same way every single time, will it always be exactly a 50/50 split?

maybe a dumb question, but just wondering...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if you toss it 9 times?
 
The results of tossing a fair coin n times is given by the binomial distribution. Specifically the probability of k heads is n!/(k!(n-k)!2n).
 
if it was tossed the exact same way it would land on the same side every time. if the take a piece of plywood and intenenally try to drop it on a cretain side you probably would not get a 50/50
 
semidevil said:
so if you set up some kind of system to flip the coin, everytime the coin is tossed, it is tossed the same way, i.e, same speed, spin, height, same landing...basically, it is just tossed the exact same way, and there is no human error or anything

Wouldn't such an accurate system make the coin fall either ONLY heads or only tails? ---you know, same speed, spin, height..."same landing"--you mean only heads/tails?
 
In theory, it might be possible to construct a device so that it always comes out heads. However, in practice there is usually enough jitter in the machinery so that it won't happen.
 
Gee, at first it seemd so paradoxical, but it isn't is it?

Say the hypothetical perfect machine can overcome all physical variables, and throw the coin exactly the same way every time. My first thought was: "Oh, it would have to throw 5 and 5.".

But no, it merely throws 10 of either heads or tails.

You still don't have a machine that can throw exactly half-way in between. That requires manual tuning, and that's not perfect. And even if you could, you'd just end up with a machine that can balance coins on their edge every time.

What you don't have, is a machine that helps you do probability experiments, since all the probability has been removed from the system.
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913:What you don't have, is a machine that helps you do probability experiments, since all the probability has been removed from the system.

That is why they use a "random number" system in computers, though how that is constructed is a matter all of its own.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 126 ·
5
Replies
126
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K