Why Does the Toy Truck Stop at 3.2m Instead of 3.5m?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a toy truck rolling up a ramp. The truck has an initial velocity and mass, and the problem includes considerations of friction and energy conservation. Participants are trying to determine why their calculated stopping distance differs from the expected value.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore energy conservation principles, including kinetic and potential energy, and the impact of friction on the truck's motion. There are attempts to apply the theorem of variation of kinetic energy and to set up equations relating initial and final energies. Some participants express confusion about how to incorporate friction into their calculations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their calculations and reasoning, noting discrepancies in their results. There is ongoing exploration of different approaches, with some guidance offered regarding the setup of energy equations. However, no consensus has been reached on the correct method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is also a focus on ensuring that all forces, including friction and gravity, are accurately accounted for in their calculations.

Alex_
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I can't get this problem and wanted to see if anyone could help me out:

A toy truck has a velocity of 6.0 m/s when it begins to role freely up a ramp inclined at 30.0 degrees. They toy has a mass of 5.0 kg, and the frictional forces present are 4.0N. What distance does the truck travel before stopping?

I keep on getting 3.5m but the correct answer is 3.2m. Anyone know how to solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about using the theorem of variation of KE...?I don't know if you have,but i found this to be the most elegant way

Daniel.
 
Well I've never heard of that theorem before, but maybe I've used it though. What I tried to do to solve this problem is figure out total energy before (Et = Ek + Ep) and then solve for when Ek is 0 after the toy has rolled up the ramp. The thing that complicates this is there's friction involved(heat, F * d). So I'm not sure how I have to include friction into this problem in order to get the right answer.
 
Set the initial energy (purely KE, if you measure PE from the bottom of the ramp) equal to the final energy (PE + the heat due to friction = PE + F*d):
[tex]{KE}_i = {PE}_f + F*d[/tex]
 
For the record the theorem (proven in an elementary version by G.W.Leibniz) states that the variation of KE for a mechanical system is equal to the total work done by external forces acting on the system.In your case,the forces are friction & gravity and the mechanical system is composed only of one particle/body.

Daniel.
 
Doc Al said:
Set the initial energy (purely KE, if you measure PE from the bottom of the ramp) equal to the final energy (PE + the heat due to friction = PE + F*d):
[tex]{KE}_i = {PE}_f + F*d[/tex]

I tried to do that, but got 3.5 as my answer, so I was off by a little bit. I'll show you how I did this problem in deatil, maybe you'll be able to catch any mistakes?

Et_i = Ek_i
Ek_i = 0.5 * 5 * 6^2
Ek_i = 90

Et_f = Ep_f + (F * d)
90 = -5 * -9.81 * h + (4 * (sin30/h))
h = 1.75 (approx.)

sin30 = 1.75/x
x = 3.5 (approx.)
 
The work done by friction is negative as well.Like the one performed by gravity.The length is approximately
[tex]x\sim \frac{180}{57}m\sim 3.2 m[/tex]

Check your calculations again.

Daniel.
 
Alex_ said:
Et_f = Ep_f + (F * d)
90 = -5 * -9.81 * h + (4 * (sin30/h))
h = 1.75 (approx.)
Redo this calculation. x = h/sin30; you have it reversed.
 
Doc Al said:
Redo this calculation. x = h/sin30; you have it reversed.

I tried that and ended up getting 4.38, so that doesn't work either.
 
  • #10
dextercioby said:
The work done by friction is negative as well.Like the one performed by gravity.The length is approximately
[tex]x\sim \frac{180}{57}m\sim 3.2 m[/tex]

Check your calculations again.

Daniel.

where did you get the 180 over 57 from?
 
  • #11
Alex_ said:
I tried that and ended up getting 4.38, so that doesn't work either.
Well, try it again. You are making an arithmetic mistake:
90 = (5)(9.8)h + (4)[2h] = 57h
=> h = ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K