What is the sum of the infinite series 1/[n(n+1)(n+2)]?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the sum of the infinite series defined by the expression 1/[n(n+1)(n+2)]. Participants explore various methods, including partial fraction decomposition and the use of mathematical software, to derive the sum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests splitting the series into partial fractions but expresses uncertainty about the next steps.
  • Another participant mentions a formula involving a common ratio but does not clarify it fully, indicating a lack of clarity on the ratio itself.
  • Some participants propose that splitting into partial fractions could lead to a telescoping series, which may simplify the summation process.
  • One participant claims that Maple computes the sum to be 1/4 but does not explain how it arrived at this result.
  • Another participant provides a detailed proof for the partial sum using partial fractions and the properties of the psi function, leading to the conclusion that the sum approaches 1/4 as n tends to infinity.
  • Several participants discuss different decompositions of the series, with one suggesting a specific form that also leads to the same result of 1/4.
  • One participant expresses confusion about how to cancel terms after applying a decomposition and receives guidance from others on identifying patterns in the terms.
  • There is mention of complex integrals related to the sums, indicating a deeper mathematical context that some participants find challenging.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While some participants agree that the sum converges to 1/4, there is no consensus on the methods to arrive at this conclusion, and various approaches are discussed without resolution on the best method.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference mathematical software and properties of special functions, indicating that some steps may depend on specific definitions or assumptions that are not fully articulated in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in series summation techniques, partial fraction decomposition, and the application of special functions in mathematical analysis.

adamg
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
hey, i was just wondering if anyone could help find the sum of the infinite series defined by 1/[n(n+1)(n+2)]. I can split it into partial fractions but not sure from there. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
its a/(1-r)...
where |r| < 1

where a is the initial values (1/6), and r is the common ratio...
it to late for my brain to think right now so I can tthink of what the ratio is going to be.. wil try tomorrow if nobody else has helped you.. going tp sleep now..gonight!
 
I'm not sure the splitting can do you any good,because each of the series you'd be geting would be infinite.If you don't know the answer,well,my Maple said it's 1/4...i don't know how it did it...

I'm going to check it in G & R,too...

Daniel.
 
i thought you could do it by splitting it into partial fractions, then finding an expression for the nth partial sum and let n tend to infinity
 
According to Maple,the partial sum is:
[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k(k+1)(k+2)} =-\frac{1}{2(n+2)(n+1)}+\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

If you can find a way to prove what I've just written,then that's it...

Daniel.
 
I think partial fractions is promising too -- with care, you can probably arrange the terms into one or more telescoping series. What did you get when you applied partial fractions?
 
Here's the proof for the partial sum:

[tex]S=:\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k(k+1)(k+2)}=\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{2(n+1)(n+2)}[/tex](1)
-----------------------------||------------------------

Use partial fractions to rewrite the initial partial sum as:

[tex]S=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k(k+1)(k+2)}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{2k}-\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k+1}+\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{2(k+2)}[/tex] (2)

According to Maple each of the three sums is:

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{2k}=\frac{1}{2}\psi(n+1)+\frac{1}{2}\gamma[/tex] (3)

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{-1}{k+1}=-\psi(n+2)+1-\gamma[/tex] (4)

[tex]\sum_{k=2}^{n} \frac{1}{2(k+2)}=\frac{1}{2}\psi(n+3)-\frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{2}\gamma[/tex](5)

Add (3)->(5) and equate with (2):

[tex]S=\frac {1}{4}+\frac{1}{2}\psi(n+1)-\psi(n+2)+\frac{1}{2}\psi(n+3)[/tex](6)

Now,use the property of "psi":

[tex]\psi(z+1)=\psi(z)+\frac{1}{z}[/tex] (7) for [itex]z\neq 0[/itex]

to write:

[tex]\psi(n+2)=\psi(n+1)+\frac{1}{n+1}[/tex] (8)

[tex]\psi(n+3)=\psi(n+2)+\frac{1}{n+2}=\psi(n+1)+\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{n+2}[/tex] (9)

to rewrite the "3-psi" term from (6) simply as:

[tex]-\frac{1}{2(n+1)(n+2)}[/tex] (10)

Then add (10) to 1/4 from (6) to get the equality you were supposed to prove... :wink:

In the initial equality set [itex]n\rightarrow +\infty[/itex] to get the answer [itex]\frac{1}{4}[/itex]

Daniel.
 
What do you think of this decomposition?

[tex] \frac{1}{k (k+1) (k+2)} = \frac{1}{2}<br /> \left(<br /> \frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{k+1} - \frac{1}{k+1} + \frac{1}{k+2}<br /> \right)[/tex]
 
That one gives the answer,too...1/4...

Daniel.
 
  • #10
Hurkyl said:
What do you think of this decomposition?

[tex] \frac{1}{k (k+1) (k+2)} = \frac{1}{2}<br /> \left(<br /> \frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{k+1} - \frac{1}{k+1} + \frac{1}{k+2}<br /> \right)[/tex]


i got this far, then not sure how to cancel terms to find the sum?
 
  • #11
Well,it's not difficult.You may write it as
[tex]\frac{1}{2}[(\frac{1}{k}-\frac{1}{k+1})-(\frac{1}{k+1}-\frac{1}{k+2})][/tex]

and then give values to "k" to see the pattern the terms take...

Daniel.
 
  • #12
yeah got it now, thanks for all the help!
 
  • #13
dextercioby said:
According to Maple each of the three sums is:

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{2k}=\frac{1}{2}\psi(n+1)+\frac{1}{2}\gamma[/tex] (3)

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{-1}{k+1}=-\psi(n+2)+1-\gamma[/tex] (4)

[tex]\sum_{k=2}^{n} \frac{1}{2(k+2)}=\frac{1}{2}\psi(n+3)-\frac{3}{4}+\frac{1}{2}\gamma[/tex](5)

Daniel.

Thanks, didn't have a clue. Turns out the first one is the following:

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{2k}=\frac{1}{2}\{\frac{\int_0^\infty e^{-t}t^{n}\ln(t)dt}{\int_0^\infty e^{-t}t^{n}dt}+\int_0^\infty \frac{1}{t}(\frac{1}{1+t}-e^{-t})dt\}[/tex]

I had no idea! Does Adamg know this? Don't mind me, I mean I had problems with Leibnitz's rule the other day. I tell you what though, if I was the teacher assigning this problem, we'd be looking at these integrals. Now how in the world does the sum turn out to be this messy expression?
 
  • #14
It comes from the logarithmic derivative of the Gamma Euler function,which is "psi"...

Daniel.
 
  • #15
Is an easy sum:

[tex]\sum\frac{1}{n(n+1)(n+2)}[/tex]=[tex]\sum\frac{1}{2n}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{2(n+2)}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{n+1}[/tex]= ([tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{6}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{8}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{10}[/tex]...+[tex]\frac{1}{6}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{8}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{10}[/tex]+...+(-[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{6}[/tex]-...) = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex]+... +(-[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{6}[/tex]-...) = [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K