Can Greedy Coloring on Chordal Graph Complements Be Proven Optimal?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the existence of a triangle-free k-chromatic graph for every positive integer k and the optimality of the greedy coloring algorithm on the complement of a chordal graph G when applied in reverse order of a simplicial ordering. Participants suggest using induction and subgraph arguments to tackle these proofs, referencing Harary's work for context on the complexity of graph theory proofs. The Kuratowski theorem is mentioned as a potential framework for constructing counterexamples in the proof process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chordal graphs and their properties
  • Familiarity with simplicial orderings in graph theory
  • Knowledge of greedy coloring algorithms
  • Basic concepts of graph theory proofs, including induction and subgraph arguments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of triangle-free k-chromatic graphs
  • Study the application of greedy coloring algorithms on chordal graphs
  • Explore the implications of the Kuratowski theorem in graph theory
  • Investigate induction techniques in proving graph properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students specializing in graph theory, particularly those interested in coloring algorithms and the properties of chordal graphs.

vshiro
does anyone have an idea on proving that there is a triangle-free k-chromatic graph for every positive integer k?

or, how to prove that given a simplicial ordering on a chordal graph G, running the greedy coloring algorithm on the reverse order gives the optimal coloring on the complement graph?

one might think to use induction but it's all very messy and ecchhh
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Usually the proofs in Graph theory have a quite messy appearence. I suggest you to have a look on Harary in order to see how boring it can be. And then I suggest that, if the assertions are true (I have not meditated about it), then try to use the subgraph argument, i.e., try to construct for the arbitrary case a subgraph that contradicts the assumption. See for example the Kuratowski theorem about planarity to see what I mean.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K