Solving Torque & Tension on Hoop w/ Mass & Radius

  • Thread starter Thread starter adamc637
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension Torque
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving torque and tension on a hoop with a specified mass and radius. Participants are exploring the relationships between torque, moment of inertia, tension, and forces acting on the hoop as it is released from rest.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of moment of inertia and torque equations, questioning the correctness of the initial assumptions regarding tension and acceleration. There are attempts to relate linear and angular quantities, as well as to clarify the axis of rotation for the moment of inertia.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various interpretations of the equations involved, with some participants providing guidance on correcting the approach to the moment of inertia. There is an acknowledgment of potential sign errors in the equations, and while some progress is made, no explicit consensus is reached on the final solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the moment of inertia used initially may not be appropriate for the problem setup, and there are discussions about the implications of different axes of rotation. The original poster expresses confusion about the relationships between tension, acceleration, and gravitational forces.

adamc637
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
A string is wrapped several times around the rim of a small hoop with radius r and mass m. The free end of the string is held in place and the hoop is released from rest.. (picture attached~)

So I tried using moment of inertia as mass*radius^2, so torque would be MR^2*alpha, and it would also be tension*R.

Solving for tension would give me mass*acceleration as tension.

Then net force would be tension-mass*gravity.

m*a=T-m*g
T=T-m*g

Now that doesn't make any sense.

Can anyone help?
 

Attachments

  • yf_Figure_10_45.jpg
    yf_Figure_10_45.jpg
    6.3 KB · Views: 1,056
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right- it doesn't make sense. T is NOT equal to m*a- for one thing, that doesn't take into account the increasing angular momentum.
 
The moment of inertia you used is for a hoop, with the axis of rotation at the centre of the hoop. You need to use the moment of inertia with the axis of rotation at the outter radius.
In this case:

[tex]I = \frac{mR^2}{2}[/tex]

Regards,

Nenad
 
Last edited:
adamc637 said:
So I tried using moment of inertia as mass*radius^2, so torque would be MR^2*alpha, and it would also be tension*R.
Nothing wrong with that. You have applied the acceleration constraint that connects [itex]\alpha[/itex] with a: [itex]a = \alpha R[/itex].

Solving for tension would give me mass*acceleration as tension.
Right. T = ma (where "a" is the magnitude of the acceleration).

Then net force would be tension-mass*gravity.
Right. The net force on the hoop is T - mg, taking up as positive. Applying Newton's 2nd law gives you: T - mg = - ma. (note the minus sign; the acceleration acts downward thus is negative)

m*a=T-m*g
T=T-m*g

Now that doesn't make any sense.
It doesn't make sense because you mixed up the signs. Combine these equations and it will make sense:
T - mg = - ma
T = ma
 
heres what happened when I did it:
[tex]RT = I\alpha[/tex]
[tex]RT = I\frac{a}{R}[/tex]

since the moment of inertia is [tex]\frac{mR^2}{2}[/tex]

then:

[tex]RT = \frac{mR^2}{2} \frac{a}{R}[/tex]
[tex]T = \frac{ma}{2}[/tex]

now we can sub this in into our free body diagram equation:

You should be able to do the rest.

Regards,

Nenad
 
Nenad said:
The moment of inertia you used is for a hoop, with the axis of rotation at the centre of the hoop. You need to use the moment of inertia with the axis of rotation at the outter radius.
In this case:

[tex]I = \frac{mR^2}{2}[/tex]
There's nothing wrong with taking a point on the edge of the hoop as your axis, but that's not the correct moment of inertia.
 
Doc Al was right. (though maybe your way Nenad could also produce the "correct" answer)

[tex]T - mg = -ma[/tex] because acceleration is downward.

[tex]2T = mg[/tex]

[tex]T = (mg)/2[/tex]

Darn little technicalities.

Thanks guys! You helped me finish my homework on time :biggrin: .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K