- #1
amp
Care to share? They are claiming relativity is based on some wrong assumptions about time, that its obsolete.
Has anyone heard of or read about The Vortex Theory?
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the Vortex Theory, which claims to challenge established concepts in relativity, particularly regarding the nature of time. Participants explore the validity of the theory, its claims, and its lack of scholarly support, as well as related ideas about time and motion.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express skepticism about the Vortex Theory, noting its lack of scholarly articles and the request for financial support to learn more about it.
- Others mention that the claims of the Vortex Theory seem to echo previous discussions on the forum regarding time as a byproduct of motion.
- One participant suggests that if the Vortex Theory is valid, it should align with the theory of interaction, referencing a resource for further reading.
- A participant invites discussion on the assumptions about time, referencing their own work titled 'CONSTRUCTION OF TIME' and its arguments against modern physics.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally express skepticism about the Vortex Theory, but there is no consensus on the validity of its claims or the assumptions about time. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of time and the implications of the theory.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight the absence of empirical support and formal publications related to the Vortex Theory, which may limit the discussion's depth and scope.