Solving Inhomogeneous Linear Equations: Proving Solvability for All a-Values

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an inhomogeneous system of linear equations and the conditions under which it can be solved for all values of 'a'. Participants are examining the implications of the matrix representation of the system and exploring the solvability based on the values of 'a'.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing the row-reduced form of the matrix and questioning the conditions under which the system has solutions. There are discussions about whether the system can be solved for every 'a' and the implications of specific values of 'a' on the existence of solutions.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the conditions for solvability, with some participants suggesting that certain values of 'a' lead to no solutions or infinite solutions. Multiple interpretations of the matrix results are being considered, and participants are questioning the validity of assumptions made in the original poster's approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of linear algebra principles, particularly regarding the relationships between the equations and their matrix representation. There is a focus on the implications of the determinant being zero and the conditions for the existence of solutions based on the values of 'a'.

Mathman23
Messages
248
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

I got this linear algebra question I hope You Guys can assist me with :smile:

Below there is a inhomogeneous system of linear equations which I solve:

[itex]x_{1} + 2x_{2} + x_{3} = a[/itex]

[itex]3x_{1} + 4x_{2} + 2x_{3} = a - 3[/itex]

[itex]-4x_{1} + 2x_{2} + x_{3} = 3[/itex]

I then end up the following matrix:

1 0 0 0 -3a/5

0 1 1/2 (2a+3)/5

0 0 0 (-11a/10)

I´m then supose to prove if its possible to solve the system for every a-value.

By solving the equation (2a+3)/5) = 0. I then get an a-value a = -1/2 .

If I insert this a into the above matrix and row-reduce that matrix I get:

1 0 0 0
0 1 1/2 0
0 0 0 1

I then do some tests and then conclude if I choose an a-value in the interval
[-1000000,1000000]. I still end up the same matrix above.

Is it then correct to assume if I chose an a-value in the interval [-infty,infty]. I would then still end up with the same matrix?

If my assumption is correct, is it then safe to assume that its possible to solve the system of linear-equations for every a-value??

sincerely
Fred
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why did you set your second line equal to 0. You should set the last row equal to 0, for to solve the system with real solutions, you need to have 0 = 0. It also epends on what kind of solutions you are looking for, do you want infinite solutions, one real solution or No solution to the system.

Regards,

Nenad
 
If you write it out in matrix form:

[tex] \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 & 2 & 1 \\<br /> 3 & 4 &2 \\<br /> -4 & 2 & 1\\ \end{array}\right)<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3\\ \end{array}\right)<br /> =\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> a \\ a-3 \\ 3 \\ \end{array}\right)[/tex]

which is solvable iff the vector on the right is in the span of the column vectors in the matrix. Do the column vectors of the matrix span the entire space?
 
Galileo said:
If you write it out in matrix form:

[tex] \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 & 2 & 1 \\<br /> 3 & 4 &2 \\<br /> -4 & 2 & 1\\ \end{array}\right)<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3\\ \end{array}\right)<br /> =\left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> a \\ a-3 \\ 3 \\ \end{array}\right)[/tex]

which is solvable iff the vector on the right is in the span of the column vectors in the matrix. Do the column vectors of the matrix span the entire space?
The Determinant of the 3x3 matrix is ZERO (0). Therefore, there does NOT exist a SINGLE UNIQUE solution. Either there are no solutions or an infinite number, depending on the value of "a".


~~
 
mathman23 said:
1 0 0 0 -3a/5

0 1 1/2 (2a+3)/5

0 0 0 (-11a/10)

I´m then supose to prove if its possible to solve the system for every a-value.
"prove if"? Do you mean "determine whether or not it is possible to solve the system for each a-value"?

The obvious point is that the last row of your final matrix: 0 0 0 (-11a/10)
is only valid if (-11a/10)= 0 which reduces to a= 0.

However, I don't get that. I get:

1 2 1 a
0 -2 -1 -2a-3
0 0 0 -6a-12

Which means a should be -2 in order for this system to have a solution. (And it will, in that case, have an infinite number of solutions.)
 
Hello Hall,

Yes what I'm attempting to determain if the system of non-homogeneous linear equations can be solved for any a !

I guess then my matrix operations are done incorrectly.

With Your result in mind I will retry them :smile:

Sincerley and thanks for Your answer.

/Fred
 
HallsofIvy said:
"prove if"? Do you mean "determine whether or not it is possible to solve the system for each a-value"?

The obvious point is that the last row of your final matrix: 0 0 0 (-11a/10)
is only valid if (-11a/10)= 0 which reduces to a= 0.

However, I don't get that. I get:

1 2 1 a
0 -2 -1 -2a-3
0 0 0 -6a-12

Which means a should be -2 in order for this system to have a solution. (And it will, in that case, have an infinite number of solutions.)


Hi Hall,

I have rerun my matrix operations and I now get the same result as You :smile:

How come its possible to conclude by solving -6a-12=0 that "a" must equal
-2 in order to the system of linear equations to have a solution?

And do this contradict the claim "determine whether or not it is possible to solve the system for each and any a-value?"

Sincerley

Fred
 
Isn't it obvious? What you are saying in doing that "row-reduction', is that the original three equations are equivalent to
x+ 2y+ z= a
-2y- z= -2a-3
0= -6a-12

In order for all those equations to be true- certainly the third one has to be true!

Since there are no x, y, or z in it we MUST have -6a- 12= 0 (therefore a= -2) in order for it to be true.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K