Learning a technique to figuring out the Explicit Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter trigger352
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explicit Formula
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the explicit formula for a sequence defined recursively. The sequence presented is 2, -4, 8, -16, which is generated by multiplying the previous term by -2. Participants are exploring techniques to derive an explicit formula from this recursive definition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the sequence and the recursive formula provided. There are inquiries about breaking down the recursive relation and finding the general term as a function of n. Some suggest methods for solving the recurrence relation, while others express confusion about the process.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the recursive formula and its implications. Some participants have offered hints and guidance on how to approach solving for the explicit formula, while others are seeking further clarification on the concepts involved. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the extent of direct assistance provided. There is an emphasis on understanding the recursive relationship and its transformation into an explicit formula.

trigger352
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I have a lot of trouble trying to figure out the explcit formula of a series of numbers.

I can see the pattern in a recursion formula, however.

[tex]2, -4, 8, -16, ...[/tex] Is a multiplication of [tex]-2[/tex] to the term before it. Which is cake to write in a recursion formula. But what about an Explicit Formula?

What techniques and ideas do you look for first? Are there any clues?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is a SEQUENCE...U need to find the expression for the general term...

It's not difficult.

[tex]a_{1}=2[/tex]
[tex]a_{n+1}=-2a_{n},\forall n\geq 1[/tex]

Now find a_{n} as a function of "n"...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
That is a SEQUENCE...U need to find the expression for the general term...

It's not difficult.

[tex]a_{1}=2[/tex]
[tex]a_{n+1}=-2a_{n},\forall n\geq 1[/tex]

Now find [tex]a_{n}[/tex] as a function of "n"...

Daniel.

Whoa. Wait, what?

Can you breakdown this formula for me:
[tex]a_{n+1}=-2a_{n},\forall n\geq 1[/tex]
?
 
dextercioby said:
That is a SEQUENCE...U need to find the expression for the general term...

It's not difficult.

[tex]a_{1}=2[/tex]
[tex]a_{n+1}=-2a_{n},\forall n\geq 1[/tex]

Now find [tex]a_{n}[/tex] as a function of "n"...

Daniel.


Whoa. Wait, What?

Can you breakdown this formula for me:
[tex]a_{n+1}=-2a_{n},\forall n\geq 1[/tex]
?
 
The [itex]n+1[/itex]st term is the [itex]n[/itex]th term multiplied by [itex]-2[/itex]. That's all that equation says. You then need to solve the equation for [itex]a_{n}[/itex] in terms of [itex]n[/itex]. It is what is called a "first order linear homogeneous constant-coefficient difference equation."

Here is a hint as to how to solve it: Guess the solution [itex]a_n = Ak^n[/itex] for some constants [itex]k[/itex] and [itex]A[/itex], and try to determined what [itex]k[/itex] is by substitution into the equation. Then solve for [itex]A[/itex] by using the initial condition [itex]a_1 = 2[/itex]
 
Last edited:
That's called "reccurence relation".It defines a sequence of numbers...

There's no guessing here.It's a simple geometric progression with the ratio "-2".

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K