Drag calculation and measurement

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of drag for an airplane, specifically using the Piper PA-38-112 Tomahawk as a test case. The net drag force is derived from the equation F_{\Sigma drag}=\frac{Power output}{velocity}, incorporating both parasite drag and induced drag. The participant highlights the challenge of measuring angle of attack due to equipment limitations and proposes using dynamic pressure measurements at 75 knots, where induced and parasite drag are equal, to plot the relationship between speed and drag. Calculus is suggested as a method to resolve the angle of attack issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aerodynamics principles, specifically drag forces
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion in aviation
  • Basic knowledge of calculus for analyzing graphs
  • Experience with graphing calculators or simulation software
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate induced drag using lift equations
  • Research dynamic pressure and its role in drag calculations
  • Explore software tools for simulating angle of attack measurements
  • Study the relationship between speed and drag in aviation contexts
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineering students, aviation enthusiasts, and anyone conducting research on aircraft performance and drag measurement techniques.

gschjetne
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I'm exploring a few topics for my IB extended essay, and since I'm into aviation, my teacher suggested I'd find the coefficient of drag for an airplane.

Finding force of net drag would be piece of cake.

[tex]F_{\Sigma drag}=\frac{Power output}{velocity}[/tex]

According to aerodynamics of an airplane at constant speed:

[tex]F_{\Sigma drag}=C_{drag} \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 + mg \cos \alpha[/tex]

The first term, parasite drag, [itex]C_{drag} \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2[/itex], should be pretty straightforward. It is the coefficient of drag times the dynamic pressure, defined as [itex]\frac{1}{2} \rho v^2[/itex]

The second term, induced drag, on the other hand, probably needs some explanation.
At lower airspeeds, the angle of attack must be higher to generate enough lift, and lower at high airspeeds, respectively. The drawback of this, though, is that the lift generated is perpendicular to the wing chord. At high angle of attacks this force turns backwards, inducing drag, hence the name.

This can be calculated as [itex]F_{lift} \sin \alpha[/itex] which means that if the plane isn't accelerating in any direction, this equals [itex]mg \cos \alpha[/itex] as long as the aircraft is not accelerating.

Rearranging:

[tex]C_{drag} = \frac{F_{\Sigma drag}}{\frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 + mg \cos \alpha}[/tex]

I'm going to test this on a Piper PA-38-112 Tomahawk. My biggest problem is that this aircraft is not equipped with angle of attack measuring equipment. To overcome this I figured that I know that at 75 knots of indicated airspeed, or dynamic pressure (I hate all non-SI units :mad: , but that's the way things aviation works, help converting would be appreciated) the terms for induced and parasite drag are equal. This is the point where the two graphs intersect, and the net drag is at a minimum (that's why Piper chose 75kts as the climb speed)

Now, if i take several measurements of the above, varying dynamic pressure (speed), I should be able to plot this into my graphing calculator. I am no math wizard, so I would appreciate some help, perhaps some calculus would do the job to get me around the angle of attack problem?

Boy, that was a lot of LaTeX! :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org


First of all, it's great to see that you're exploring a topic that you're passionate about for your IB extended essay. Calculating and measuring drag for an airplane is definitely a complex and interesting topic.

Your equations for calculating the force of net drag are correct and it's great that you have a solid understanding of the different components that contribute to drag. The parasite drag term is indeed straightforward, as it is simply the product of the coefficient of drag and the dynamic pressure. However, as you mentioned, the induced drag term is a bit more complicated. It's important to note that the induced drag is not caused by the angle of attack itself, but rather by the lift produced at that angle of attack. This is why the induced drag term is proportional to the lift force, which is represented by F_{lift}.

Your approach to testing this on the Piper PA-38-112 Tomahawk is a good one. By taking multiple measurements at different speeds and plotting them on a graph, you should be able to see the relationship between dynamic pressure and drag force. As for the angle of attack problem, you're right that calculus can help you solve it. Calculus can help you find the slope of the graph at different points, which can then be used to calculate the angle of attack. Another option is to use a computer program or simulator that can measure the angle of attack for you.

Overall, it seems like you have a solid understanding of the concept of drag and how to measure it. Keep up the good work and don't hesitate to seek help from your teacher or other resources if you encounter any difficulties. Good luck with your extended essay!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K