Alternating Series: Does Divergence Hold?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of alternating series, specifically comparing the convergence of a standard series with its alternating counterpart. The original poster questions whether the divergence of a non-alternating series implies the same for its alternating version.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the criteria for alternating series, referencing the alternating series test and its implications for convergence. Questions arise regarding the reliability of conclusions drawn from the divergence of non-alternating series to their alternating forms.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide references to tests for convergence and discuss the properties of conditionally convergent series. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these tests without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific series and their convergence properties, while also referencing external resources for further understanding. The discussion includes considerations of the conditions under which series converge or diverge.

tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
I know that a series such as

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

is divergent. Is this also the case for an alternating version of the same series, i.e.,

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What criteria do you have for alternating series?

Daniel.
 
As dexter hinted to, look up the alternating series test. A stronger version is Abel's test, and even stronger is the Dirichlet test.
 
Well, I know about the alternate series test, I am just saying that is it reliable to say that if a particular series does not converge to a certain sum, then a similar series that alternates between positive and negative also will not converge to a specific sum?
 
well, it depends on the series. The alternating series test says that

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^na_n, \; \mbox{with} \ a_n \geq a_{n+1} \ \forall n \geq 0[/tex]

converges if [itex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_n = 0[/itex].

So in your specific example, the alternating series converges, even though the series is not absolutely convergent, because

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{n+1}} \leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \ \forall n \geq 1[/tex]

and

[tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} = 0[/tex]

If a series is convergent but not absolutely convergent, we call it conditionally convergent. Conditionally convergent series have some very unintuitive properties, one of which is described here:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RiemannSeriesTheorem.html
 
The sum is approximately [itex]0.6[/itex]...


Daniel.
 
Regarding the MathWorld reference:

Can anyone explain to me how to calculate these sums?

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{4k(2k-1)}=\frac{1}{2}ln(2)[/tex]

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{k+1}}{k}=ln(2)[/tex]
 
The last is very easy,if u consider the Taylor series of [itex]\ln(1+x)[/itex] around zero...(there's another elegant construction,too).

As for the first,write it like that

[tex]S=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{2k(2k-1)}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty} \left(\frac{1}{2k-1}-\frac{1}{2k}\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left[\left(1-\frac{1}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4}\right)+...\right]= \frac{1}{2}\ln 2[/tex]

,where i made use of the second sum...

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
dextercioby said:
The last is very easy,if u consider the Taylor series of [itex]\ln(1+x)[/itex] around zero...(there's another elegant construction,too).

As for the first,write it like that

[tex]S=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{2k(2k-1)}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty} \left(\frac{1}{2k-1}-\frac{1}{2k}\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left[\left(1-\frac{1}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4}\right)+...\right]= \frac{1}{2}\ln 2[/tex]

,where i made use of the second sum...

Daniel.

Oh Jesus. I think you've already told me something like that before with another one. I'll spend some time with it. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K