Boris Borcic
Apr3-05, 11:32 AM
<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no, location=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no ,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>\nConsider sphere inversion, the transform mapping the center of a sphere to\ninfinity all around, the surface of the sphere to itself, and exchanges the\ninside and the ouside of the sphere, while inverting the embedding order of\nall concentric spheres.\n\nNow contemplate the idea that physics might be invariant by inversion\nthrough spheres of a certain size. How do the actual scales of physics\ncompare, in terms of providing minimum likeliness to the idea, when put to\nthe role of radius of the invariant sphere ?\n\nOr is as such the test insufficiently specified wrt "Lorentzian reality" ?\n\nTIA, Boris Borcic\n--\nWhat does F(Syracuse) hear if F(Eureka) is the = in E=mc^2 ?\nCosmetic, cosmic, comic, cmc, mcc, mc^2, E = Albert !\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>Consider sphere inversion, the transform mapping the center of a sphere to
infinity all around, the surface of the sphere to itself, and exchanges the
inside and the ouside of the sphere, while inverting the embedding order of
all concentric spheres.
Now contemplate the idea that physics might be invariant by inversion
through spheres of a certain size. How do the actual scales of physics
compare, in terms of providing minimum likeliness to the idea, when put to
the role of radius of the invariant sphere ?
Or is as such the test insufficiently specified wrt "Lorentzian reality" ?
TIA, Boris Borcic
--
What does F(Syracuse) hear if F(Eureka) is the = in E=mc^2 ?
Cosmetic, cosmic, comic, cmc, mcc, mc^2, E = Albert !
infinity all around, the surface of the sphere to itself, and exchanges the
inside and the ouside of the sphere, while inverting the embedding order of
all concentric spheres.
Now contemplate the idea that physics might be invariant by inversion
through spheres of a certain size. How do the actual scales of physics
compare, in terms of providing minimum likeliness to the idea, when put to
the role of radius of the invariant sphere ?
Or is as such the test insufficiently specified wrt "Lorentzian reality" ?
TIA, Boris Borcic
--
What does F(Syracuse) hear if F(Eureka) is the = in E=mc^2 ?
Cosmetic, cosmic, comic, cmc, mcc, mc^2, E = Albert !